xmcamail.2011_04 by Date

• Thread Index

• [xmca] FW: AERA's New Mobile APP in Ed Week blog today
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Fri Apr 01 08:53:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Inside Job
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 01 17:34:22 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] AERA phone app
  • Kris Gutierrez (Fri Apr 01 18:34:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Dodgy Formulations
  • David Kellogg (Sat Apr 02 22:47:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Dodgy Formulations
  • Bella Kotik-Friedgut (Sun Apr 03 00:20:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 03 18:02:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 4
• Re: [xmca] Dodgy Formulations
  • David Kellogg (Sun Apr 03 19:04:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 03 19:54:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Mon Apr 04 03:43:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] new book
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Mon Apr 04 03:51:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 04 07:43:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Fwd: Research as film
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 04 12:00:47 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] on queering Digital Media and Learning: concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 04 14:32:01 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 04 15:05:55 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • Peg Griffin (Mon Apr 04 16:58:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] on queering Digital Media and Learning: concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Mon Apr 04 17:24:47 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • Ivo Banaco (Mon Apr 04 17:36:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 04 23:30:22 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Is psychology a science?
  • pecheco martinez (Tue Apr 05 10:08:54 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Is psychology a science?
  • mike cole (Tue Apr 05 17:00:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Larry Purss (Wed Apr 06 07:58:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • mike cole (Wed Apr 06 09:17:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] new Vygotsky book
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Wed Apr 06 09:51:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] new Vygotsky book
  • mike cole (Wed Apr 06 09:55:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Martin Packer (Wed Apr 06 14:25:06 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Larry Purss (Thu Apr 07 07:14:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Andy's visit to Wits School of Education Johannesburg February 2011
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 07 23:07:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 08 09:02:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Larry Purss (Fri Apr 08 17:51:10 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] Action Research and Cultural- Historical Activity theory
  • mike cole (Fri Apr 08 21:00:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] Action Research and Cultural- Historical Activity theory
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 08 21:47:24 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Action Research and Cultural- Historical Activity theory
  • nacho . montero (Sat Apr 09 08:46:06 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] collaborative notes and wiki during AERA
  • Mark Chen (Sat Apr 09 08:52:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Action Research and Cultural- Historical Activity theory
  • mike cole (Sat Apr 09 08:56:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] collaborative notes and wiki during AERA
  • mike cole (Sat Apr 09 08:57:45 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 09 09:14:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • mike cole (Sat Apr 09 11:10:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems DevelopmentalModel
  • Peg Griffin (Sat Apr 09 11:18:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 09 21:52:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] FW: Sv: FW: book prospectus
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Sun Apr 10 10:09:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 10 10:34:18 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 10 11:33:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• Re: [xmca] collaborative notes and wiki during AERA
  • Greg Mcverry (Sun Apr 10 12:40:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] collaborative notes and wiki during AERA
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 10 17:10:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Jay Lemke (Sun Apr 10 17:55:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 10 18:25:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Sun Apr 10 18:36:49 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 10 18:45:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 10 18:48:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Jay Lemke (Sun Apr 10 19:08:05 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Sun Apr 10 19:12:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 10 20:24:56 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 11 08:31:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Mon Apr 11 10:14:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 14:42:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 11 15:10:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 4
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 15:25:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] Polls quivering with expectation!
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 11 15:29:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • White, Phillip (Mon Apr 11 15:37:01 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 11 16:12:06 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • White, Phillip (Mon Apr 11 16:27:00 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 16:39:54 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 11 16:42:21 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 16:54:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • C Barker (Mon Apr 11 17:12:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] MARKED activity within a Dynamic Systems Developmental Model
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 17:17:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • White, Phillip (Mon Apr 11 18:52:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Mon Apr 11 20:11:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 20:16:53 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 11 20:32:54 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • David Kellogg (Mon Apr 11 20:45:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Michael Glassman (Tue Apr 12 04:27:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Vygotsky concept
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Tue Apr 12 07:13:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Steve Gabosch (Tue Apr 12 10:31:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Tue Apr 12 10:46:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Tue Apr 12 10:47:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Michael Glassman (Tue Apr 12 13:08:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Tue Apr 12 13:43:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Tue Apr 12 15:44:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • David Kellogg (Tue Apr 12 17:44:36 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• RE: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • Michael Glassman (Tue Apr 12 18:18:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 12 18:42:53 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 12 18:56:10 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane (Tue Apr 12 19:10:57 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Tue Apr 12 20:20:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 12 20:42:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] senses of sense and meaning
  • Jay Lemke (Tue Apr 12 20:54:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Tue Apr 12 21:27:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 12 21:56:05 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Larry Purss (Tue Apr 12 23:16:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 12 23:27:58 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • Martin Packer (Wed Apr 13 06:41:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Wed Apr 13 10:21:00 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • David Kellogg (Wed Apr 13 17:01:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 4
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Wed Apr 13 17:41:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • David Kellogg (Wed Apr 13 18:01:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 14 06:51:32 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Steve Gabosch (Thu Apr 14 09:51:58 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Thu Apr 14 12:13:27 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 14 14:43:49 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • David Kellogg (Thu Apr 14 18:23:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 14 18:38:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 14 18:40:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 14 19:27:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 14 19:32:48 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 14 20:19:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane (Thu Apr 14 22:12:55 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 14 22:47:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane (Thu Apr 14 23:59:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] Test
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane (Fri Apr 15 00:10:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane (Fri Apr 15 00:46:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 15 07:19:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 15 07:42:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts: Missing Voices
  • Michael Glassman (Fri Apr 15 08:25:47 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] concepts
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Fri Apr 15 09:26:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Vera John-Steiner (Fri Apr 15 11:01:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • David Kellogg (Fri Apr 15 14:59:22 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • White, Phillip (Sat Apr 16 08:06:22 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] MATT SHEPARD IS A FRIEND OF MINE
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Sat Apr 16 12:58:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] MATT SHEPARD IS A FRIEND OF MINE
  • Dale Cyphert (Sat Apr 16 14:11:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Sat Apr 16 15:30:45 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Re: xmca Digest, Vol 71, Issue 16
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 17 02:47:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 17 02:56:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 17 03:05:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 17 03:16:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 05:30:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Sun Apr 17 06:19:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 06:37:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Sun Apr 17 06:42:18 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 06:56:32 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Michael Glassman (Sun Apr 17 06:57:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 07:05:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Michael Glassman (Sun Apr 17 07:11:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 07:20:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 07:47:05 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Robert Bracewell, Dr. (Sun Apr 17 07:56:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 08:00:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • David H Kirshner (Sun Apr 17 08:55:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • JAG (Sun Apr 17 09:07:32 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • David H Kirshner (Sun Apr 17 09:13:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] concepts
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Sun Apr 17 09:57:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 17 12:00:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Ivan Rosero (Sun Apr 17 13:00:54 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 17 13:02:47 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 17 13:29:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 17 15:11:33 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 17:02:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 20:56:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Joseph Gilbert (Sun Apr 17 23:32:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 17 23:56:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Done Voting?
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 18 02:25:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Mon Apr 18 03:15:18 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] Culture as the Cause of War
  • David H Kirshner (Mon Apr 18 03:19:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Mon Apr 18 03:32:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Mon Apr 18 03:39:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 18 08:36:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 4
• Re: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • cconnery (Mon Apr 18 09:12:53 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • Duvall, Emily (Mon Apr 18 09:16:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Martin Packer (Mon Apr 18 10:04:10 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Mon Apr 18 12:51:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 18 12:51:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 18 12:52:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Mon Apr 18 13:16:57 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 18 14:25:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 18 15:40:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Achilles Delari Junior (Mon Apr 18 16:01:02 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 18 16:27:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] FW: Autistic Boy: Higher IQ Than Einstein Dev's Own Th. of Relativity
  • Achilles Delari Junior (Mon Apr 18 16:44:22 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • Robert Lake (Mon Apr 18 17:34:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Mon Apr 18 18:01:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • Lois Holzman (Mon Apr 18 19:37:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 18 21:22:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 18 21:39:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 18 21:45:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 18 22:17:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • Jay Lemke (Mon Apr 18 22:28:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Mon Apr 18 22:32:36 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• 2 bits Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • Tony Whitson (Mon Apr 18 22:48:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Tony Whitson (Mon Apr 18 22:53:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] Anna Stetsenko's notion of Social Conduct
  • Larry Purss (Mon Apr 18 23:48:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 18 23:48:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 18 23:59:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: 2 bits Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
  • mike cole (Tue Apr 19 00:02:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 00:53:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 19 01:01:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 01:18:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 01:30:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • anna sfard (Tue Apr 19 01:51:55 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 19 01:53:24 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 02:14:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 19 02:14:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 19 02:34:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • anna sfard (Tue Apr 19 02:34:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 03:48:53 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 05:21:55 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Michael Glassman (Tue Apr 19 05:32:47 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 06:02:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Anna Stetsenko's notion of Social Conduct
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Tue Apr 19 08:07:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • White, Phillip (Tue Apr 19 08:17:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 19 08:34:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • mike cole (Tue Apr 19 09:00:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Michael Glassman (Tue Apr 19 09:02:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • mike cole (Tue Apr 19 09:09:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Michael Glassman (Tue Apr 19 09:24:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • White, Phillip (Tue Apr 19 10:01:00 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 10:37:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 10:41:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 19 11:02:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Robert Lake (Tue Apr 19 12:13:33 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Anna Stetsenko's notion of Social Conduct
  • Steve Gabosch (Tue Apr 19 15:55:23 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 19 19:50:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Tue Apr 19 19:54:23 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Anna Stetsenko's notion of Social Conduct
  • Larry Purss (Tue Apr 19 19:57:06 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts
  • Monica Hansen (Tue Apr 19 20:09:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Anna Stetsenko's notion of Social Conduct
  • Larry Purss (Tue Apr 19 21:25:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 20 01:14:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • mike cole (Wed Apr 20 02:45:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Larry Purss (Wed Apr 20 07:24:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • White, Phillip (Wed Apr 20 08:48:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 20 09:52:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 20 10:32:18 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Wed Apr 20 10:59:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Monica Hansen (Wed Apr 20 13:13:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Wed Apr 20 13:47:49 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Mark Chen (Wed Apr 20 14:29:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Monica Hansen (Wed Apr 20 14:57:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 20 17:00:33 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] The Child's Conception of the Nation
  • David Kellogg (Wed Apr 20 19:09:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Wed Apr 20 21:30:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Wed Apr 20 21:51:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • anna sfard (Wed Apr 20 22:50:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • mike cole (Wed Apr 20 23:52:53 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 00:18:21 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • anna sfard (Thu Apr 21 00:45:45 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 07:13:02 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 07:13:03 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 07:15:49 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 07:19:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] material intersubjective and subjective
  • Larry Purss (Thu Apr 21 07:58:23 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 08:06:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 08:20:10 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 08:24:00 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 21 08:33:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 08:38:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 08:40:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 21 08:40:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 08:52:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 21 09:11:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] A Modest Proposal for Intergenerational Assistance
  • mike cole (Thu Apr 21 09:20:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 21 09:31:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 09:38:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 09:40:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 21 09:51:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] material intersubjective and subjective
  • mike cole (Thu Apr 21 09:57:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 10:19:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Vera John-Steiner (Thu Apr 21 10:34:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 21 11:07:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 11:09:58 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 11:53:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • anna sfard (Thu Apr 21 11:58:00 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Thu Apr 21 12:25:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 14:20:21 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 16:49:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 16:57:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Thu Apr 21 18:31:06 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 18:40:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Thu Apr 21 19:09:50 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Steve Gabosch (Thu Apr 21 20:36:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] S.L. Rubenshtein and Merleau-Ponty
  • Larry Purss (Thu Apr 21 23:02:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] S.L. Rubenshtein and Merleau-Ponty
  • mike cole (Thu Apr 21 23:43:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 00:31:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Fri Apr 22 03:05:05 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Fri Apr 22 03:41:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 04:18:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Fri Apr 22 04:27:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Joanne Hyatt (Fri Apr 22 04:33:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 04:45:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • mike cole (Fri Apr 22 06:46:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • Larry Purss (Fri Apr 22 07:08:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• [xmca] activity and reification
  • Larry Purss (Fri Apr 22 07:42:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 07:50:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] New Yorker
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 08:29:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 22 08:35:18 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • Eli Tucker-Raymond (Fri Apr 22 09:49:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • mike cole (Fri Apr 22 10:34:33 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • Jenna McWilliams (Fri Apr 22 10:38:56 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 22 11:10:21 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 22 11:27:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity and reification
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 14:09:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 22 16:52:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 17:56:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Jay Lemke (Fri Apr 22 18:21:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 18:22:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 18:32:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Martin Packer (Fri Apr 22 20:07:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• RE: [xmca] activity and reification
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 21:12:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• PS to Martin - Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 21:20:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity and reification
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 22:08:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• FW: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 22:09:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 22:42:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Fri Apr 22 22:53:23 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• FW: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • anna sfard (Fri Apr 22 23:47:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • anna sfard (Sat Apr 23 00:02:10 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 00:16:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 00:18:37 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 00:20:43 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Steve Gabosch (Sat Apr 23 01:47:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 02:08:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Sat Apr 23 04:16:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 05:00:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Sat Apr 23 05:27:14 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 05:40:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Sat Apr 23 06:17:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Steve Gabosch (Sat Apr 23 07:35:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 23 07:38:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 07:42:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 07:52:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Monica Hansen (Sat Apr 23 08:19:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 23 08:26:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 08:36:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 08:44:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Monica Hansen (Sat Apr 23 08:52:49 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity and reification
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 08:58:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Steve Gabosch (Sat Apr 23 09:04:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 09:21:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 23 11:19:24 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• [xmca] inner form
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 23 12:18:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity and a disourse
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 13:07:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] Discussion of T&S
  • Steve Gabosch (Sat Apr 23 13:44:33 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Vera John-Steiner (Sat Apr 23 13:52:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] 17 free volumes of MCA??
  • Huw Lloyd (Sat Apr 23 14:01:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Sat Apr 23 16:21:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Discussion of T&S
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 23 18:02:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 18:33:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sat Apr 23 18:35:54 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• [xmca] Capriccio
  • David Kellogg (Sat Apr 23 20:17:45 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] Capriccio and Clairon
  • David Kellogg (Sat Apr 23 20:20:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 24 00:35:54 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 01:14:40 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] activity and reification
  • anna sfard (Sun Apr 24 02:10:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] activity and a discourse
  • anna sfard (Sun Apr 24 02:28:18 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 24 02:31:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • mike cole (Sun Apr 24 02:49:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 03:14:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 03:21:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 24 05:22:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 24 05:42:30 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 24 05:58:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 24 06:13:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 24 06:33:02 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 07:12:27 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 07:18:46 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 24 07:49:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] discourse and unit
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 07:53:05 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Andy Blunden (Sun Apr 24 08:02:28 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Capriccio
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 24 09:19:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Unconstrained choices and a proposal
  • Huw Lloyd (Sun Apr 24 10:35:32 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Sun Apr 24 14:39:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] Capriccio
  • David Kellogg (Sun Apr 24 18:59:17 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Re: levitin book
  • mike cole (Mon Apr 25 01:30:57 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] book on play
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Mon Apr 25 03:00:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Re: XMCA process-form diagrams
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 25 04:26:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Mon Apr 25 07:11:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 25 13:18:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Mon Apr 25 18:00:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Bill Blanton (Mon Apr 25 22:22:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Andy Blunden (Mon Apr 25 22:42:36 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Temple (Tue Apr 26 04:25:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Martin Packer (Tue Apr 26 06:13:39 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Andy Blunden (Tue Apr 26 06:29:36 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Tue Apr 26 06:46:04 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Tue Apr 26 06:51:51 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • Huw Lloyd (Tue Apr 26 07:55:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] activity (was concepts)
  • ERIC . RAMBERG (Tue Apr 26 09:25:25 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Joanne Hyatt (Tue Apr 26 10:17:44 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] fetishism
  • Monica Hansen (Tue Apr 26 10:25:58 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • ANTHONY M BARRA (Tue Apr 26 11:13:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Tue Apr 26 11:26:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Tue Apr 26 11:27:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Joanne Hyatt (Tue Apr 26 12:34:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • David H Kirshner (Tue Apr 26 15:15:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] fetishism
  • Martin Packer (Tue Apr 26 16:11:24 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 3
• [xmca] Sense and Sensibility
  • David Kellogg (Tue Apr 26 16:47:02 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts for LSV and us
  • Jay Lemke (Tue Apr 26 23:59:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 27 06:27:07 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts for LSV and us
  • Larry Purss (Wed Apr 27 07:15:16 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 27 07:26:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • David H Kirshner (Wed Apr 27 10:03:29 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 27 10:46:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Working with Vygotsky et al
  • Huw Lloyd (Wed Apr 27 15:28:32 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] concepts for LSV and us
  • Martin Packer (Wed Apr 27 17:46:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] concepts for LSV and us
  • Monica Hansen (Wed Apr 27 19:53:35 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] (no subject)
  • Denise Newnham (Thu Apr 28 08:31:34 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • Jay Lemke (Thu Apr 28 13:03:33 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] concepts for LSV and us
  • Larry Purss (Thu Apr 28 15:36:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] spontaneous concepts indeed
  • David H Kirshner (Thu Apr 28 15:44:06 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Monica Hansen (Thu Apr 28 16:43:26 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 28 17:10:08 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 28 17:23:12 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Monica Hansen (Thu Apr 28 18:16:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Martin Packer (Thu Apr 28 20:26:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • David Kellogg (Fri Apr 29 02:09:53 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Huw Lloyd (Fri Apr 29 05:58:42 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Larry Purss (Fri Apr 29 07:06:15 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• [xmca] books for students and families in the Tuscaloosa area
  • Peter Smagorinsky (Fri Apr 29 08:35:31 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] nonverbal representations
  • Monica Hansen (Fri Apr 29 11:01:41 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] nonverbal representations
  • Vera John-Steiner (Fri Apr 29 11:10:48 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] nonverbal representations
  • Robert Lake (Fri Apr 29 11:50:09 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• RE: [xmca] nonverbal representations
  • Monica Hansen (Fri Apr 29 13:46:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • David Kellogg (Fri Apr 29 20:55:13 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• RE: [xmca] sense and sensibility
  • Denise Newnham (Sat Apr 30 02:33:01 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Levitin's "One is not born a personality" Plus
  • mike cole (Sat Apr 30 06:33:49 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] books for students and families in the Tuscaloosa area
  • mike cole (Sat Apr 30 06:34:11 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• [xmca] Transhistorical or embodied
  • Larry Purss (Sat Apr 30 06:51:59 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 1
• Re: [xmca] nonverbal representations
  • Bella Kotik-Friedgut (Sat Apr 30 08:55:38 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Transhistorical or embodied
  • David Kellogg (Sat Apr 30 15:15:52 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 2
• Re: [xmca] Transhistorical or embodied
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 30 15:59:19 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0
• Re: [xmca] Transhistorical or embodied
  • Martin Packer (Sat Apr 30 16:12:20 2011)
  • Number of follow-up msgs: 0