Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?

[mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>]

It certainly is relevant, Peg.
And here is one way in which the deed is done.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/05/opinion/05nocera.html?_r=1&hp

What amazes me is that people really hurt by all of this blame the victims.
Neither Christian nor scientific! :-(
mike


On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Peg Griffin <Peg.Griffin@att.net> wrote:

> Maybe this will help to open up the issue:
>
> http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2011/0404/Do-you-think-the-poor-
> are-lazy<http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2011/0404/Do-you-think-the-poor-%0Aare-lazy>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
> Behalf Of mike cole
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 9:02 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Cc: elizabeth anne daigle
> Subject: Re: [xmca] Re: Human Sciences Scholar life?
>
> I would like to take this conversation back to Wagner's earlier request for
> information about how we, at LCHC, are trying to organize our work so that
> graduate students can deal strategically with the rapidly changing
> ideological, political, and economic times.
>
> Please note that our discussion is oriented toward the young members of
> LCHC
> including the many undergraduates who we work with in practicum courses
> where we can get to know them well enough to be intelligent interlocutors.
> The issues are necessarily different for people at different stages of
> their
> careers, never mind in different national settings.
>
> LCHC is at UCSD, a research university with a long tradition of high levels
> of government and industrial financial support. The social sciences and
> humanities in general are seen as a special "problem" because they do not
> bring in big bucks, relatively speaking (some parts of our Social Science
> division, which includes psychology, economics, and cognitive science do
> bring in substantial outside research monies).
>
> Within UCSD, LCHC is one of those odd, hybrid organizations that focuses
> both on community-based research and undergradute education, two largely
> neglected concerns, academically speaking. We make our way by virtue of
> past
> accomplishments and the fact that the University is in desperate need of
> help in dealing with issues of class and ethnic diversity, which we also
> do.
>
> So if you are a graduate student associated with the laboratory, I give the
> following advice: Prepare yourself for at least three identities associated
> with three domains (perhaps the term, markets, would not be inappropriate)
> where you can be paid to do something that you would not mind doing and
> allow you some way to retain the resources (time) for academic inquiry.
>
> Which three selves the students pick depends upon their special funds of
> knowledge and personal goals. Knowledge of a foreign language, knowledge of
> contemporary computer programming at a graduate student level, knowledge of
> film making, etc.
> Each of these selves emerges pari parsu with the long term goals that each
> student formulates.
>
> We are systematically seeking partnerships which can serve both as sources
> of support and potential future career goals of the students. As is
> obvious,
> we network.
>
> Beyond this point, its all pretty local in making the appropriate
> experiences available.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> A word about the present situation. This is not the first time in my
> lifetime that academia and the national economy and world peace have face
> very difficult times.
> Bad news can aggregate, like storm clouds, that may or may not blow away.
> Hard to tell.
>
> I find it amazing, in this connection to consider the life work of my
> cohort
> of scholars in Russia, never mind the conditions under which their parents
> lived and died. Think about an 80 year old Russian academic who attended
> Moscow University when Stalin was in power and published his first article
> the year that Khruchev denounced Stalin.
>
> In both cases, what has never ceased to amaze me is the generativity of
> their theoretical commitments and methodological power under
> extraordinarily
> difficult circumstances. They found ways, wherever they could find work, to
> continue a humanistic tradition of practice-based thought no matter how
> unwelcoming the soil for the seeds they wish to propagate.
>
> ISCAR, along with XMCA, seems like an organization that is quite
> sympathetic
> to confronting seriously the difficult circumstances our students face.
> There is a meeting of ISCAR coming up in September and, well, here we are
> on
> XMCA.
>
> Do other more senior people on the list have different/better advice to
> profer? As I said, so much depends upon the local, generalization tends to
> be useless for those under the gun.
>
> mike
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:10 PM, elizabeth anne daigle <
> elizabethdaigle@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > How does the ennui of academia compare to the experiences of public
> > school teachers?
> >
> > ...
> > This NYTimes debate comes from the recent report that suggests the US
> > would do well to improve the status of the profession of teaching.
> >
> >
> > the report:
> >
> > http://www.mcgraw-hillresearchfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/pisa-i
> > ntl-competitiveness.pdf
> >
> >
> > the online debate at nytimes:
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/03/27/how-to-raise-the-statu
> > s-of-teachers?hp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Potentially, this is an arena for these discussions of the roles of
> > schools/schooling, the value of "value added models" of quantifying
> > teacher efficacy, the differences(and intrinsic relations) between
> > thinking/knowing/understanding/asking...  In so many ways, it seems
> > like this should be the time in the US for these thoughtful
> > conversations.
> >
> >
> > .....the readers' comments are like roadkill--- fascinating and
> disturbing.
> >
> > There's something cultural about valuing learning as distinct from
> > having knowledge.
> > Is it that the commodification of knowledge makes teaching merely a
> > vehicle, and thus not worthy of respect?
> >
> > And its economic inefficiency is an affront to this model of what is
> > important, making it somehow threatening in its continued centrality
> > in socialization?
> >
> > I was thrilled to see this report come out and naively thought, "Yeah-
> > NOW The Man will finally see!!!"
> > ...as my mother says, "It must be hard to see with his head where it is."
> >
> >
> >    1. Re: Human Sciences Scholar life? (Jenna McWilliams)
> >   2. Re: lsv "sketching the future" -- From tool and sign?
> >       (Larry Purss)
> >   3. Re: Culture of Poverty, not reduxed enough
> > (ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:25:27 -0400
> > From: Jenna McWilliams <jennamcjenna@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [xmca] Human Sciences Scholar life?
> > To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> > Message-ID: <3D8476E0-DC34-49AC-AEF3-67DC69DB6DD5@gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> >
> > Google "Tihomir Petrov AND urinate" and you'll fetch 8,500 results,
> > which is more than 100 times the number of Google Scholar results
> > attached to Petrov (73). And Peter, I do think Petrov may have had a
> > broader (alleged) impact on his students and his field through his
> > (alleged) actions than through his scholarly publications.
> >
> > Recently, a disaffected fellow graduate student told me she wished
> > someone had informed her of the high attrition rate for Ph.D. students
> > before she decided to pursue graduate study. My response: Someone
> > probably did tell her. Someone certainly told me--many people told
> > me-- about the long, grim path of academia. We don't listen because of
> > one very human characteristic: We think we're special. We think: it
> > must be so sad for those students who do drop out before finishing
> > their dissertations, for those academics who can't find jobs, for
> > those scholars who can't figure out how to balance their priorities.
> >
> > Hey, at least I'm having a really good time in my toils toward
> > obscurity. To borrow a line, I get to visit exotic locales (like
> > Scottsdale and Indianapolis!), meet interesting people (like Mike Cole
> > and Jay Lemke!) and...well, never mind the rest.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~~
> >
> > Jenna McWilliams
> > Learning Sciences Program, Indiana University ~
> > http://www.jennamcwilliams.com http://twitter.com/jennamcjenna
> >
> > ~
> > jenmcwil@indiana.edu
> > jennamcjenna@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 27, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Peter Smagorinsky wrote:
> >
> > > Here's one way to make an impact:
> > >
> > > * The Feral Professor:  Tihomir Petrov, 43, a mathematics professor
> > > at California State University Northridge, was charged in January
> > > with misdemeanors for allegedly urinating twice on the office door
> > > of a colleague with whom he had been feuding.  (Petrov was
> > > identified by a hidden camera installed after the original puddles
> > > turned up.)  Petrov is the author of several scholarly papers, with
> > > titles such as "Rationality of Moduli of Elliptic Fibrations With
> > > Fixed Monodromy." [Los Angeles Daily News-AP, 1-27-2011]
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-
> > > bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Wagner Schmit
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 5:32 PM
> > > To: lchcmike@gmail.com
> > > Cc: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> > > Subject: Re: [xmca] Human Sciences Scholar life?
> > >
> > > Another video, this time "Simpsons" view of Grad Students
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XViCOAu6UC0&NR=1
> > >
> > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XViCOAu6UC0&NR=1>Wagner
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Wagner Schmit <mcfion@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I'm a freshman in academic life... pursuing a PhD and already
> > >> working as temporary teacher at University and College. The only
> > >> thing that makes me still pursue an academic life is that i try to
> > >> make my students think  about the impact of their work in other
> > >> peoples lifes, and that, i hope, my research will bring something
> > >> that may help people in their school life...
> > >>
> > >> But it is hard, no time to read, no time to write (the coordinator
> > >> of our research group always says "you need to publish"), all
> > >> "free" time i have is dedicated to prepare classes and supervision
> > >> of  trainees. No weekend, no holiday, no vacation and a very low
> > >> payment (my students in the private college i work have a better
> > >> income than me).
> > >>
> > >> But what worries me  most: who really reads what we publish? I see
> > >> ideas in the educational field pointed as "innovation", but they
> > >> were already presented by people like Dewey and Vygotsky decades
> > >> ago... One of my students, after a meeting with pedagogues of a
> > >> high school, pointed out that "all we listen and see is just common
> > >> sense, where are the application of all those researches you
> > >> pointed? where are the educational theories?"
> > >>
> > >> I point out that one of the works of Psychologists in School (since
> > >> i give classes to future psychologists) is to rethink school along
> > >> side with the school community (teachers, administration, parents,
> > >> students)...
> > >> This helps
> > >> articulate science and real life, but only in a punctual way (in
> > >> the daily life in school)...
> > >>
> > >> What about academic life? what can we do to change it? Or, should
> > >> it be changed? Where are the academic debates, innovation and
> > >> contribution to society?
> > >>
> > >> Those things make me sleepless sometimes
> > >>
> > >> Wagner Luiz Schmit
> > >> Londrina State University - Brazil
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:45 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I think all of us recognize this scene, Wagner.
> > >>>
> > >>> At LCHC we are discussing these issues. "We" includes grad
> > >>> students, post-docs, old people like me. We are lucky that the
> > >>> interpersonal alienation at LCHC is lower than that depicted
> > >>> (although it is in abundant profusion among those around us). But
> > >>> difficulties for grad students contemplating making a living in
> > >>> academia are pretty grim, especially outside of the presumably
> > >>> "non-ideological" areas of science and technology (where a
> > >>> different set of alienating circumstances are plentiful).
> > >>>
> > >>> We have no great revelations but we are grateful that we have
> > >>> adopted an intellectual stance that makes the study of human life
> > >>> in cultural practices our grounding. we are trying to work that
> > >>> into an implementable strategy for surviving graduate school and
> > >>> gaining acceptable employment.
> > >>>
> > >>> What are others doing? What more might we be doing collectively?
> > >>> mike
> > >>>http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
> >
> > End of xmca Digest, Vol 70, Issue 28
> > ************************************
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: "
> > __________________________________________
> > _____
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca