These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
neat, peg. Gotta learn about squirrel writing! got me pondering about meaning and blushing tomatoes! mike On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Peg Griffin <Peg.Griffin@att.net> wrote: > Grice does it more like this: > Tomatoes as well as squirrels and humans can express "meaning natural." > > Both squirrels and humans also understand the "meaning natural." I don't > know about other tomatoes. > > Tomatoes, though, don't express "meaning non-natural." > Squirrels? I don't know about squirrels and the expression of non-natural > meaning; those cute sexy bonobos, though, they do express and understand > meaning non-natural (according to fairly recent work on their "writing" in > the dirt). > > A human blush is "meaning natural" but tomatoes and squirrels (and some > humans) may not attend to it or "get it." > A human's sun-burn is meaning non-natural, too. But it arises and we work > it out differently than we would a blush. > And humans with different socio-cultural resources may interpret the blush > differently. > > Meaning non-natural includes language and other socio-cultural conventional > systems, whether static and limited or generative and creative, explicit, > implied, or inferred via reliance on implicatures. > Grice has written about indexicality clearly within the meaning non-natural > realm but not much related to Pierce's index, I think. > So not sure if any one of this matters to priznak. > > -----Original Message----- > From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On > Behalf Of mike cole > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:59 AM > To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity > Subject: Re: [xmca] Znak and Priznak > > So pre-znak is natural line of development, while znak is cultural line? > Naw. My squirrels know when my tomatoes are ripe, darn critters. > mike > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Peg Griffin <Peg.Griffin@att.net> wrote: > > > BTW, H. P. Grice used an example like "redness of a tomato ... that it > > is ripe" when he was discussing his distinction between "meaning > > natural" and "meaning non-natural." > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] > > On Behalf Of Bella Kotik-Friedgut > > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:14 AM > > To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity > > Subject: Re: [xmca] Znak and Priznak > > > > I would say that znak is closer to index but priznak may be also some > > real quality (redness of a tomato is a priznak that it is ripe) may be > > priznak we can see as pre znak? > > Bella Kotik > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Achilles Delari Junior < > > achilles_delari@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, XMCA, > > > > > > One more extemporaneous question. > > > > > > Do you know something about any relations between the Russian term > > > "priznak" > > > and the peircean concept of "index"? There are many mentions to > "priznak" > > > in the > > > "Studies on the history of behavior: ape, primitive, and child" from > > > Vygotsky and Luria... and, of course, a "priznak" must be a kind of > > > "znak" (sign)... > > > But no > > > necessarily the "priznak"'s role, in some kinds of relations between > > > human beings and his environment, is posed in strictly semiotic > > > terms along the book... > > > Can we > > > find something more about the role of "index" in Vygotsky theory of > sign? > > > How > > > does Russian semiotics designate Pierce typology of sings, for > instance? > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > Achilles. > > > >From Brazil. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Acesse o Portal MSN do seu celular e se mantenha sempre atualizado. > > > Clique aqui. > > > > > > http://www.windowslive.com.br/celular/home.asp?utm_source=MSN_Hotmai > > > l& > > > utm_medium=Tagline&utm_campaign=MobileServices200908________________ > > > __ > > > _____________________________ > > > xmca mailing list > > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours Bella Kotik-Friedgut > > _______________________________________________ > > xmca mailing list > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > > > > _______________________________________________ > > xmca mailing list > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > > > _______________________________________________ > xmca mailing list > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > > _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca