[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xmca] Znak and Priznak
- To: <lchcmike@gmail.com>, "'eXtended Mind, Culture,Activity'" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: RE: [xmca] Znak and Priznak
- From: "Peg Griffin" <Peg.Griffin@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:36:19 -0400
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <30364f990910270759l3e3056c3kddb4b8302a530723@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <771993.46304.qm@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><9D3CE051-C234-42BE-AE14-048FA63ECC49@duq.edu><30364f990910261504g25025593ube7ac92baec91bb@mail.gmail.com><BAY121-W33E7DFA5AD9AA0263F081592BA0@phx.gbl><ad502df30910270113s386b2576r5effdb4936c87b14@mail.gmail.com><ED79D6F0CBED4A66A7D4B97F12E95A85@Galluzzo> <30364f990910270759l3e3056c3kddb4b8302a530723@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- Thread-index: AcpXFjomTWz8e0PTRo60S4fIOJ6fhAAAMUEg
Grice does it more like this:
Tomatoes as well as squirrels and humans can express "meaning natural."
Both squirrels and humans also understand the "meaning natural." I don't
know about other tomatoes.
Tomatoes, though, don't express "meaning non-natural."
Squirrels? I don't know about squirrels and the expression of non-natural
meaning; those cute sexy bonobos, though, they do express and understand
meaning non-natural (according to fairly recent work on their "writing" in
the dirt).
A human blush is "meaning natural" but tomatoes and squirrels (and some
humans) may not attend to it or "get it."
A human's sun-burn is meaning non-natural, too. But it arises and we work
it out differently than we would a blush.
And humans with different socio-cultural resources may interpret the blush
differently.
Meaning non-natural includes language and other socio-cultural conventional
systems, whether static and limited or generative and creative, explicit,
implied, or inferred via reliance on implicatures.
Grice has written about indexicality clearly within the meaning non-natural
realm but not much related to Pierce's index, I think.
So not sure if any one of this matters to priznak.
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
Behalf Of mike cole
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:59 AM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: Re: [xmca] Znak and Priznak
So pre-znak is natural line of development, while znak is cultural line?
Naw. My squirrels know when my tomatoes are ripe, darn critters.
mike
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Peg Griffin <Peg.Griffin@att.net> wrote:
> BTW, H. P. Grice used an example like "redness of a tomato ... that it
> is ripe" when he was discussing his distinction between "meaning
> natural" and "meaning non-natural."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu]
> On Behalf Of Bella Kotik-Friedgut
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:14 AM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: Re: [xmca] Znak and Priznak
>
> I would say that znak is closer to index but priznak may be also some
> real quality (redness of a tomato is a priznak that it is ripe) may be
> priznak we can see as pre znak?
> Bella Kotik
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Achilles Delari Junior <
> achilles_delari@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi, XMCA,
> >
> > One more extemporaneous question.
> >
> > Do you know something about any relations between the Russian term
> > "priznak"
> > and the peircean concept of "index"? There are many mentions to
"priznak"
> > in the
> > "Studies on the history of behavior: ape, primitive, and child" from
> > Vygotsky and Luria... and, of course, a "priznak" must be a kind of
> > "znak" (sign)...
> > But no
> > necessarily the "priznak"'s role, in some kinds of relations between
> > human beings and his environment, is posed in strictly semiotic
> > terms along the book...
> > Can we
> > find something more about the role of "index" in Vygotsky theory of
sign?
> > How
> > does Russian semiotics designate Pierce typology of sings, for instance?
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > Achilles.
> > >From Brazil.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Acesse o Portal MSN do seu celular e se mantenha sempre atualizado.
> > Clique aqui.
> >
> > http://www.windowslive.com.br/celular/home.asp?utm_source=MSN_Hotmai
> > l&
> > utm_medium=Tagline&utm_campaign=MobileServices200908________________
> > __
> > _____________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours Bella Kotik-Friedgut
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca