> Establshing shared goals/visions?
> trust?
> division of labor?
> complementarity?
>
> Which of these things would remove from your own conception of culture?
SHAREDness of goals
Trust.
What do you think?
Judy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Cole [mailto:mcole@weber.ucsd.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 1:38 PM
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: re: cr&c
>
>
>
> I can see that those working to create activities where
> reflective practice
> is valued and implemented have good reason not to want to substitute
> culture into Bill's paragraph. I am, of course, speaking of culture as
> (better, from) a particular perspective and it is polysemic. Reflective
> practice is also polysemic. Even the word polysemic is polysemic.
>
> However, which of the following things is not characteristic of culture
> as understood in chat discourse:
>
> I am also uncomfortable about the substtution as I think collaborative
> reflection is a highly specific practice and there are some important
> principles that givern it including the establishment of a shared
> vision or
> goal, the establishment of trust, division of labor, complementarity, etc.
>
> Establshing shared goals/visions?
> trust?
> division of labor?
> complementarity?
>
> Which of these things would remove from your own conception of culture?
> mike
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 11:42:23 PST