I agree with Judy - I would remove trust and shared goals. Trust, because it has strong moral connotations that don't seem to belong in a basic definition of culture, and Shared Goals because this implies a consciousness (of goals) that participants in a culture may not possess. We are often not conscious of our participation in a culture as culture.
--Sarah Beck
----- Original Message -----
From: Judy Diamondstone <jdiamondstone@clarku.edu>
Date: Saturday, March 20, 2004 1:57 pm
Subject: RE: cr&c
> > Establshing shared goals/visions?
> > trust?
> > division of labor?
> > complementarity?
> >
> > Which of these things would remove from your own conception of
> culture?
> SHAREDness of goals
> Trust.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Judy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Cole [mcole@weber.ucsd.edu]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 1:38 PM
> > To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > Subject: re: cr&c
> >
> >
> >
> > I can see that those working to create activities where
> > reflective practice
> > is valued and implemented have good reason not to want to substitute
> > culture into Bill's paragraph. I am, of course, speaking of
> culture as
> > (better, from) a particular perspective and it is polysemic.
> Reflective> practice is also polysemic. Even the word polysemic is
> polysemic.>
> > However, which of the following things is not characteristic of
> culture> as understood in chat discourse:
> >
> > I am also uncomfortable about the substtution as I think
> collaborative> reflection is a highly specific practice and there
> are some important
> > principles that givern it including the establishment of a shared
> > vision or
> > goal, the establishment of trust, division of labor,
> complementarity, etc.
> >
> > Establshing shared goals/visions?
> > trust?
> > division of labor?
> > complementarity?
> >
> > Which of these things would remove from your own conception of
> culture?> mike
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 11:42:23 PST