Can you elaborate on this and bring examples, please
>In my review of _The World on Paper_, I noted the interesting
>case that in dialogue, one's interlocutor's interpretation of
>utterances (their own, and ours) are "privileged" in certain
>very practical senses (for the coordination of activity). But
>that it is an error of hermeneutical practice to carry such
>notions of authorial privilege or intentionality over to
>cases where there is no such dialogue to worry over (long dead
>authors of written texts). In such cases there may be others
>whose interpretations have practical privilege (others in our
>reading communities, for example), but all these privileges
>are only practical ones, not essential ones grounded in the
>nature of language, communication, or meaning, as is sometimes
>asserted. JAY.
Thanks,
Eugene Matusov
------------------------
Eugene Matusov
UC Santa Cruz