Ana-- Your highlighting reminds me that Ed Hutchins defines cognition as the
propogation of
representation across media. Can that be just an accidental association?
On 7/6/05, Ana Marjanovic-Shane <ana@zmajcenter.org> wrote:
>
> Harry Daniels wrote:
> (snip)
>
> BUT the social categories within activity carry
> their power through the principles of regulation of communication that they
> generate into possibilities for understanding. This is where I find the
> third space pedagogy work so fascinating -- *the connections made between
> different modalities of utterance may serve to transform social
> possibilities*. (amphasis Ana's)
>
> (Snip)
>
> Harry,
> I wonder if this - *the connections made between different modalities of
> utterance* - may also be the precise point into which we can look to see
> the actual genesis of meaning - how the new concepts and understandings are
> forged AND how the new symbols are made.
> I would also like to know more about what counts as a "third space
> pedagogy". Is it the work of Carol Lee and Kris Gutierrez?
> I think that the concept of the "third space" is still in the making and
> that different people might have different associations. But I find it very
> important because it is that new dimension that is missing in many
> discussions of the "relation between utterance and social categories".
>
> Ana
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 01 2005 - 01:00:57 PDT