Harry Daniels wrote:
>BUT the social categories within activity carry
>their power through the principles of regulation of communication that they
>generate into possibilities for understanding. This is where I find the
>third space pedagogy work so fascinating -- _*the connections made between
>different modalities of utterance may serve to transform social
>possibilities*_. (amphasis Ana's)
I wonder if this - *the connections made between different modalities of
utterance* - may also be the precise point into which we can look to
see the actual genesis of meaning - how the new concepts and
understandings are forged AND how the new symbols are made.
I would also like to know more about what counts as a "third space
pedagogy". Is it the work of Carol Lee and Kris Gutierrez?
I think that the concept of the "third space" is still in the making and
that different people might have different associations. But I find it
very important because it is that new dimension that is missing in many
discussions of the "relation between utterance and social categories".
xmca mailing list
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 01 2005 - 01:00:57 PDT