Hello Martin:
I like the concept but am wondering why you chose biological evolution and
not phylogenesis?
eric
Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu>
Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
03/14/2010 12:20 PM
Please respond to "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
cc:
Subject: Re: [xmca] Dialects of Development- Sameroff
On Mar 14, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Larry Purss wrote:
>
> What do others think of the double helix (and/or the other visual images
in the article). How central is the double helix (either as an "is Like"
or "IS" objectification) to your notions of the human sciences?
> Larry
>
...and I am pretty sure I stole, I mean appropriated, this from someone;
I've forgotten who...
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Attachment:
PastedGraphic-2.pdf
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca