Mabel,
Yes, this is where LSV insists on the importance of not confusing
epistemological issues with ontological ones. It's one of the more puzzling
passages in Crisis, and I suspect there are some problems with the
translation. (Is the indented passage a quotation from Hoffding? Does anyone
have that text?) Nothing here about methodological dualism, however. I don't
think this passage is the place to start to understand better the
distinction between epistemology and ontology, if that is what you want to
do.
Martin
You might consider taking a look here (if so tell me whether or not it
helps):
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist
theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational
Psychologist, 35(4), 227-241.
On Nov 14, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Mabel Encinas wrote:
Martin,
Here it is (Andy sent it to me, I have it in hardcopy Vol 3 of Vygotsky's
Collected Works, p. 310):
http://marx.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/psycri13.htm#p1367
Mabel
Subject: Re: [xmca] Emotions and methodology
From: packer@duq.edu
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:42:06 -0500
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Mabel,
I confess I don't recognize the term methodological dualism. Where are
you finding this?
Martin
On Nov 14, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Mabel Encinas wrote:
My question to Andy was if he could please give me some references
about the difference-relation between ontological and methodological
dualism? I was aimed to get some contemporary references to this discussion.
I already had read Vygotsky. Does anyone has a suggestion, please?
Thank you,
Mabel
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:56:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [xmca] Hello Other Brain, how are you?
From: lchcmike@gmail.com
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
There was a discussion of this topic around your MCA article a while
back,
Michael. Mabel might be able to use some of the specific techniques,
which,
I recall, were not too demading in terms of technology, to find a
bridge to
what her advisors expect.
Martin's sources are right on. But Mabel is going to have to negotiate
the
rocky
shoals of her own institutional situation, and invoking XMCA is not
likely
to win her a lot of friends!!
mike
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Wolff-Michael Roth <mroth@uvic.ca>
wrote:
In the following piece, we show how emotion (as evidenced in prosody)
is a
resource for the coordination of social action. Michael
Cult Stud of Sci Educ
DOI 10.1007/s11422-009-9203-8
Solidarity and conflict: aligned and misaligned prosody
as a transactional resource in intra- and intercultural
communication involving power differences
Wolff-Michael Roth Æ Kenneth Tobin
here
On 2009-11-14, at 6:55 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
I'm going to ignore Andy's request to ignore his message to Mabel,
because
I'm sure Mabel is not the only person being told this sort of thing.
The
claim, I suppose, is that emotion is a subjective experience, and
therefore
something mental, internal, personal, private and so inaccessible to
other
people, including the researcher, who has access only to the external
'expression' of that emotion, on the face, in movements, etc.
Nonsense. How to argue against that view? Take a look at Joe de
Rivera's
work on emotions as interpersonal movements, towards or away from
people on
three interpersonal dimensions of intimacy, openness, and status.
Read Hall
and Cobey (1976) on emotion as transformation of the world. Read
Mead's
Mind, Self and Society where he challenges Darwin, insisting that "we
cannot approach them [emotions] from the point of view of expressing
a
content in the mind of the individual" (p. 17) because to do so
presumes a
dualism between consciousness and the biological organism.
These are some resources that come immediately to my mind. What can
others
out there recommend?
Martin
On Nov 14, 2009, at 4:42 AM, Andy Blunden wrote:
You have good muses Mabel (Vygotsky and Marx), pity you
don't have better supervisors. Your approach, studying
microsituations as social, is Vygotsky's approach too, I
think, and excellent one, that is often, I fear, not well
understood. I am probably the last person to ask about that
kind of problem as I have a devil of a problem making myself
understood. Others will know the answers to your questions
better than me, too. But I will mention a few suggestions.
Mabel Encinas wrote:
My supervisors are questioning now, that I do not study emotions,
but
"the expression of emotions". I know how to solidify my argument in
this
bit, but could you please give me some references of where should I
read
about the difference-relation between ontological and
methodological
dualism?
I guess you have already read Vygotsky's comments on
ontological vs methodological/epistemological dualism:
http://marx.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/psycri13.htm#p1367
If you use Google on this one, you will probably find a page
where I am being attacked by someone called Neville for
failing to make this distinction. I am far from sure of the
value of that exchange but you are welcome to read it. I
would not attempt a short summary of this issue.
I am not sure what you are being accused of about emotions.
Martha Nussbaum is a Critical Theorist who writes good stuff
about emotions. And of course everyone reads Antonio
Damassio, with his distinction between feelings and
emotions. Certainly, emotions are only present in
consciousness thanks to their "interpretation" by culturally
acquired concepts.
""the expression of emotions" is a strange expression to me.
Are they using "emotions" to refer to forms of consciousness
which are "expressed" in high blood pressure, etc? Or are
they using "emotions" to refer to physiological conditions,
which are "expressed" in the character of behavior. I don't
understand. I am sure others will know. Sounds like a
template accusation.
Andy
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your friends updated—even when you’re not signed in.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_5:092010_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook updates, right
from Hotmail®.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_4:092009_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca