Re: [xmca] definition of 'activity'

From: Andy Blunden (
Date: Mon Jan 09 2006 - 14:25:43 PST

  Anja Koski-Jännes's article on addiction combining semiology (of the
  Peircean kind) and activity theory, in "

   Perspectives on activity theory" ed Engeström, Miettinen, & Punamäki,
   was a life-changing read for me. Sounds similar. Mikeal's work looks
   interesting too. It must be the Finnish flavour.
   At 05:28 PM 9/01/2006 +0200, you wrote:

     Dear Mary,
     Mikeal Leiman from the University of Joensuu in Finland has been working
     quite a long time with object relations theory and activity theory, taking
     special interest on the concept of sign and semiotic mediation. He
     and does research on psychotherapy.
     You can start from his article 'The concept of sign in the work of
     Winnicot and Bahtin' in the 1999 'Perspectives on Activity
     Theory. Learning in doing...' (Cambridge University Press) book. The
     is placed in the fourth section on 'Theraby and addiction', but it is a
     fully theoretical piece.
     Have a look at [1]
     You can find e.g. a full version of his article 'Toward Semiotic
     The role of sign-mediation in dialogical self' was in Theory and
     in 2002, from the web page [2]
     With warm wishes for the new year,
     Quoting "Mary K. Bryson" <>:
> I was thinking about this very thing this morning, reading the
> of
> Activity Theory on wikipedia... And it occurred to me as I presented one
> of
> the many variants of the triangle to the students in my brand new
> sociocultural theory class, that there is an odd disconnect between
> activity
> theory, and its attendant notions of goal-directed actions and the
> importance of objects, and object-relations theory, and its critical
> focus
> on the psychological and constitutive value of objects. Maybe there is
> some
> really well known piece of work out there that brings these two threads
> together, but if there is -- (a) I don't know what it is (not
> surprizing)
> and (b) I would love to read it, so please tell me about it.
> The affective and psychic -- that is, subjectivity -- pieces of activity
> theory seem really short-sighted and overly rational, which is where
> object-relations seems to have a lot to offer, and yet rarely be cited
> by
> socioculturalists...
> Sunday musings,
> Mary (Happy New Year)
> PS> I was going to propose to moderate/coordinate a discussion of a
> reading
> in February, but I think with the generous offer of participation by
> in
> his mediational theories course, that perhaps I should hold off until
> or
> so?
     xmca mailing list
     [3]htt= p://

   Hegel Summer= School 17th February 2006, University of Melbourne
   "UnReason in Revolt= - Postmodern Conservatism"


   1. 3D"" 2. 3D"" 3. 3D""
   4. 3D""_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 01:00:09 PST