Ans what are the contradictions, bb? Need some help here.
dp
bb writes:
> To combine these two threads, and not let the issue be washed, I note the gender and cultural differences in what is being said by whom. Look for yourself. I think what Mary and Nancy sense is something to which we (guys/good ol' guys) should pay attention -- the very change in volume of postings is evidence enough, and one would dialectically approach this looming issue looking for the deeper underlaying contradiction, not just claim that this is not normal. We can do better to make sure xmca does not become an institution that "buries its contradictions".
>
> Damn, it certainly is good (for me, anyway) that Mary continues to push and make one think beyond the boundaries that the past has created. THIS feels like what xmca has been and could be.
>
> bb
>
>
>> I also was taken aback by the reference to "good girl," and appreciate Mary
>> bringing it to explicit discussion. Yes, second language and other issues
>> may be part of the explanation for the particular remark. I think Mary's
>> other comment about an exclusive or private men's club warrants more
>> thought. If you think (or if we looked in the archives) of who posts, who
>> directs the discussions, whose posting get responded to, it seems a trend of
>> male-weighted influence appears. Another indication of this pattern, and one
>> I had thought to post shortly after ISCAR but didn't, for fear of offending,
>> is the "Future of" the field in Sevilla. All panelists were white men. The
>> message to me was that that future is likely to continue to be largely
>> shaped by white men, as it has been to this point. The scholarly work of
>> women (and people of color) hasn't been treated as central to the direction,
>> nor in that panel was it treated as central to the future, of this
>> community. I may be being a bit harsh, but works by, for example, Marianne
>> Heiddegard, Kris Gutierrez, Carol Lee have been widely influential, but they
>> weren't invited to participate in that important event (I know I'm
>> neglecting other important scholars and I apologize. I am only listing
>> examples). So, I think Mary pointed to something important.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>> Nancy
>>
>> Nancy Ares
>> Assistant Professor
>> Teaching & Curriculum
>> The Warner Graduate School of Education
>> and Human Development
>> University of Rochester
>> P.O. Box 270425
>> Rochester, NY 14627
>> 585-273-5957
>> fax 585-473-7598
>>
>> > ----------
>> > From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu on behalf of Carol Macdonald
>> > Reply To: macdonaldc@educ.wits.ac.za;eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
>> > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 2:08 PM
>> > To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
>> > Subject: [xmca] This really isn't typical, guys
>> >
>> > Mary
>> > I have never seen any sexism on this list before, and I truly believe that
>> > the great people I met at Sevilla are embarrassed by the language of this
>> > posting. We all have a real contribution to make, so please don't go
>> > away.
>> > If you are really are still brassed off, write to me personally, and blow
>> > off steam....:) (And you know that "guys" is now a gender neutral term,
>> > don't you!)
>> >
>> > Shame on you Ricardo!
>> >
>> > Carol
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10/28/05 8:00 AM, "Ricardo Japiassu" <rjapias@uol.com.br> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The most part of article is a predictable critical review of Leontiev1s
>> > > Activity, Counsciousness and Personality - not because Dr. Setsenko1s
>> > > thinking cannot go beyond the obvious rather present an original
>> > approach
>> > to
>> > > activity but, in my point of view, because she preffers to be a 3good
>> > girl2.
>> >
>> > Misogynist sexist objectification of any author or their work is
>> > absolutely
>> > unacceptable on this list.
>> > If we are ever going to move forward in this field towards a body of
>> > knowledges that is anything other than over-determined by a particularly
>> > gendered history this kind of signifying practice can not be condoned.
>> > You have almost managed in practical terms to have a private men's club,
>> > with a few women relegated to the wings. If this really is the intent,
>> > then
>> > be clear about it and the rest of us can move elsewhere.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > xmca mailing list
>> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > xmca mailing list
>> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
David D. Preiss
home page: http://pantheon.yale.edu/~ddp6/
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 01:00:22 PST