So, we jointly construct the following:
>So forget it, one might conclude. After all, how can you fully understand
>a system that you are a part of of? Uncertainty and the non-posibility
>of Newspeak are the good news!
And I just don't know how to respond in this late hour except to ask in
return, "How can you fully understand a system that you are not part of? "
and upon asking so, I comprehend that this is the response expected.
-------
And from Vico down to contemporary cognitive science we get the thought
that to really understand something it helps a lot if you can make it,
or participate in its creation and use.
-----
Maybe critical activity striving to grow next generations would be a worthwhile
form of inquiry?
mike