[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] "Rising to the concrete"

What would you make of an analog computer, Huw? Is it analog or digital?

Huw Lloyd wrote:
On 17 August 2012 19:03, Ivan Rosero <irosero@ucsd.edu> wrote:

In the interest of understanding you Huw, these two lines in your most
recent post jumped out at me

To assert that something is not relevant is to prevent such creative

Going back to the other contention, your assertion that analog and
digital belong to a different frame is wrong.  The only possible truth of
the assertion is that they have nothing to do with your frame...

The following lines also struck me

To abstract is to measure.  To measure is to compare.  Comparison is

These assertions create a pretty big universe of seemingly irrelevant
things to thinking about abstraction and comparison.  I wonder, for
example, if abstraction can be about something other than measuring?  And,
would the following sentence count as comparison?

"A dog is kind of like a sheep."

Yes, it can count as comparison.

If yes, is this a "digital" comparison?  If no, what is this sentence in
your estimation?

Yes.   For the dog to be conceived of as like a sheep, you are comparing a
model of a dog with a model of a sheep.

Likewise the only means of comparing the two living things is by various
measurements.  To say that one is like another is to compare conceptions
made from aggregated abstractions.

But you could say "My dog is a sheep", which is not such a comparison.

I do not like writing that someone is wrong, but then I do not like
obfuscation even more.  If you think it's out of place, please forgive the


xmca mailing list

xmca mailing list

*Andy Blunden*
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Book: http://www.brill.nl/concepts

xmca mailing list