[Xmca-l] Re: "conscious awareness enters through the gate" (a Participation Question)

[Andy Blunden]

I guess Anna Karenina doesn't count.

andy

------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
Hegel for Social Movements <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!WKA8CiA5azgMUwfEnrkzol9M6mPBf-p7V_ojFgC1gK7BDPCZh60G5_6E_ESa2ViFsR96iw$ >
Home Page <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!WKA8CiA5azgMUwfEnrkzol9M6mPBf-p7V_ojFgC1gK7BDPCZh60G5_6E_ESa2ViznpNMpw$ >
On 12/08/2020 10:51 pm, Glassman, Michael wrote:
>
> Here is a question I have for people who do a lot of 
> direct reading of Vygotsky and I hope some on this list 
> can help me. In his paper on the psychology of the actor 
> he cite Liubov Gurevich. From what I can remember this is 
> the only time he cited a female scholar (the period seems 
> to be intensely misogynist).  I think Vygotsky would have 
> gotten blowback on this. My question is do people know of 
> another time he cited a female scholar (other than 
> Gurevich). I think this is consequential and I am trying 
> to figure out how consequential.
>
> Thanks in advance for anybody who might be able to help.
>
> p.s: Gurevich was Stanislavski’s literary advisor, editor 
> and confidante but she was also an incredibly influential 
> figure in Russian/Soviet literature in her own right.
>
> Michael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20200812/57692eab/attachment.html