These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Tobias Rees has a wonderful article in American Ethnologist
("Being Neurologically Human Today: Life and Science and Adult
Cerebral Plasticity - An Ethical Analysis" Volume 37, Issue 1,
pages 150–166) that talks about the "regime of fixity" in
neuroscience, and the way this story of the brain has been
maintained over the years and is now being challenged.
Elizabeth Fein, Ph.D.
University of Chicago
Department of Comparative Human Development
Postdoctoral Fellow, SociAbility
(847)559-3240
efein@sociabilitychicago.org
---- Original message ----
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:44:10 +1000
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu (on behalf of Andy Blunden
<ablunden@mira.net>)
Subject: [xmca] Plasticity and Physiotherapy
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
On the theme of empirical evidence and the latest discoveries
of
neuroscience, this is one which has intrigued me, especially
since it
became personal. So far as I know, physiotherpists have known
for at
least two generations that brain damage can be repaired by
physical
exercise. But this scientific, empirical knowledge,
coexisted, at least
in some countries, with a dogma taught in school biology
classes, that
"no new brain cells are created after age X," making a total
mystery
(SFAICS) of all manner of learning processes which everyone
knows about
>from daily experience. Then we hear from the tribunes of
advanced
neuroscience, armed with all sorts of advanced brain imaging
equipment,
about "brain plasiticity" and what lowly physiotherpists know
about with
their own hands and patients knew about with their own
experience of
rehabilitation, became a new scientific discovery solely
because
(SAFAICS) it was expressed in the language of "the latest
discoveries of
neuroscience." On the plus side Norman Doigue's campaign has
had a
psychological impact on people undergoing rehabilitation, by
giving the
stamp of neuroscientific approval to the physiotherapists'
work and
giving renewed hope.
Is there anyone who knows about the history of science in
this area that
can explain how this fiction was maintained?
Andy
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
*Andy Blunden*
Joint Editor MCA: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hmca20/18/1
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Book: http://www.brill.nl/concepts
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca