Re: [xmca] The God Terminus and other forbidden topics

[christine schweighart <schweighartgate@hotmail.com>]

OOps technology hitch.! missed the subject heading:Reading further unity again - across both passions  maybe - you miss that indignaos have a background culture with much dialectic and dialogue richness - this is expression!There is a not too far, history of activism all through the 20th century- it is not 'gut feeling that a campesino has - but knowledge too ,  'to decide' is a rational frame. There is preference and this can be aesthetic - which in the case of Andalucia - which I know better than Burgos or Asturias - is the way.I'll share a video a protest by indignaos  sent to me by my 20 something nephew indignao:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv5dh8v7mDsChristine. I am thinking about the "Indignados" movement in Spain. When asked
what they were doing, what their goals were, the only thing clear is
that they were united in Sol square because they shared the same
feeling of discuss with the State, with politicians, with banks and
bankers, with the capitalist system, etc. They may draw on the logic
and discourse of ecologists or anarchists, or whatever, but the social
foundation is that of a gut feeling. Hi, 
 
I 'm torn between two passions - this  discussion won!:) I can't do justice. First Hello Arturo - we haven't spoken since discussion Bernstein's descriptive qualities   ( despite being vinculated in the same institution:))
your comment:
"
The system of social regulations is built
upon everyday concepts, without which you basically cannot mediate
scientific concepts. But the notions of what is correct for the group
is always regulated by this kind of feeling, of what is felt as proper
or improper, right or wrong. And although there is emotional
contagion, at the end emotions get mediated by concepts as a way to
appease and control them. "Shows a value of the enlightenment 'rationality in control', Yet all such mediation can do is 'align' consistency of 'logic' with an underlying value - just as Wittgenstein's smallest utterence with 'gesture'A 'group' [ and this implies 'subjectification already] oriented to 'correctness' is working within a static 'correct' - to be able to keep that open  the values underpinning different conceptual dynamics - in dialogue- are continually 're-explored . [ to self-produce 'feeling of correct'  and justice etc in the ongoing dynamic.This is a sideways glance - naturally coming from a backward one - but by no means 'causal' - possibility of orienting to other than what realise now - or 'ideal'  breaks  inherently - but how /who etc. are the big questions.. A collective 'phenomenology' - but - to find conditions to be receptive to 'perspectives' is itself a 'power-relational' issue, and the 'current' social norm:value:roles in play are such that maintain the status quo.My current intense interest is if a 'pure' dialogic form is 'excluded' from academic practice - in terms of status recognition etc - whilst being drafted in as 'technologists' - in what then holds contradictions and 'nightmares'. Ole. Family visit ahead - Just thanks Larry for your 'time-out' to flag this in the way that you did. Christine. 		 	   		  __________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca