[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Interpreting Leontiev: functionalism and Anglo Finnish Insufficiences
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Interpreting Leontiev: functionalism and Anglo Finnish Insufficiences
- From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:09:06 +1100
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <BAY146-W49ADE961EC8EB4ADF8B4E4B3A40@phx.gbl>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BAY146-W49ADE961EC8EB4ADF8B4E4B3A40@phx.gbl>
- Reply-to: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
The way you have explained Vasilyuk's ideas makes them very attractive
for me. I would certainly be interested in following up these ideas. All
that stuff around exploring crisis situations sounds very fruitful to me.
On the other hand, even before I came to CHAT I felt that "values" was a
very derivative concept, and in general it seems to be treated as a
second order concept in CHAT. Values are real enough, and I can see that
they are explanatory up to a point. But I wouldn't take them as basic.
But thanks for that Vasilyuk stuff!!
Andy
christine schweighart wrote:
Andy,
On appropriating motive Perhaps bringing in Fyodor Vasilyuk's ' The
Psychology of Experiencing . An Analysis of how critical situations
are dealt with' 1984/88 would be relevant. The theme goes back to the
earlier thread of 'parallel' subjectivity of Gonzalez Rey from social
relations , Vasilyuk sees a relation between motive and 'values' :
" In the first place, by the fact that values in themselves have no
stimulating energy and force and therefore are incapable of directly
compelling motives and behaviour to obey them.
A value does, on the other hand, have the power to produce emotions,
for instance if a choice already made is clearly in conflict with it.
This means that the value must be taken ( in the terms of the
psychological theory of activity) to be in the same category as
motive, for emotions relate to separate activities, reflecting the
course of their realisation of various motives..(.ref.)
.....
It is possible to suppose that in the course of individual development
values undergo a definite evolution, changing not only in content but
in motivational status as well, in the place they occupy and the role
they play in the structure of life activity' p139
Vasilyuk's interest in a critical-situation threshold and dealing
with them is to be seen as an 'individual's investigation of the
situation (which is ) not cognitive in intent, nor is it intellectual
in method, it is trying to find answers not to universal questions but
to questions of vital interest to the individual. It is not rational
cognition, but probing of the internal and external bounds of
possibility, a testing out of the world and of the self.' He refers to
a coming up against a reality 'such as never was' always at a border
line , which require creativity and can become growing points.
In the book Vasilyuk explores 'frustration' suggests a 'typology of
frustration behaviours'. then explores Conflict and Crisis, defence
mechanisms. Related to ‘experiencing ‘ hedonist’ ‘realistic’ ‘value’
and ‘creative’ l experiencing. I was interested that he also tried
to situate 'energy' into his schema.
In Chapter 3 he considers these dynamics in ‘cultural-historical
determination of experiencing – he goes on to explore archetypes and
schemas or collective concepts for ‘depth of perspective of meaning’ –
These 'schematisms of consciousness' / archetypes and he mentions a
few examples of this kind - 'are able to serve as a form through which
an individual makes sense of, or re-interprets, the events and
circumstances of life, and are thus a culturally prescribed form for
individual experiencing' one which he sharply differentiates from
intellectual acquisition of knowledge, entering into 'not by mind
alone but involves the whole of life', or an 'attuning' when 'one has
attained a state of consciousness 'appropriate to the internal order
of the schematism concerned'...'attuned ??.
I hadn't read this mentioned much before I found my way to this book,
seems very relevant to this discussion, though too much for me to
take on at once. The focus that makes it interesting is that
Vasilyuk is trying ( at that time ) to look at ‘a life as a whole’,
biography and critical situations. And struggles of realizing integrity.
Christine.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
Joint Editor MCA: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hmca20/18/1
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca