[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [xmca] Interpreting Leontiev: functionalism and Anglo Finnish Insufficiences
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: Re: [xmca] Interpreting Leontiev: functionalism and Anglo Finnish Insufficiences
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:34:59 -0800
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=qVNvzt1WLCvm6Vui+qPGuOKvjSu+3XGkGQJdBAgk1kY=; b=lkrjHRAS6lmduERl0IBjWkQcKiLxoW9IBBTafrD+sQICI1t4dKCHejsGRG5nSF0mG3 wgiuClA/FBkXWzR1M+vi1p4rXvM5lv5TE9TuCkHGVE1/glpE1wq516PonV1tsvTSTYFO sQQo7+E7WqgHASkbGAqJ2IHWm4wsCWdRJc0Y8=
- In-reply-to: <BAY146-W49ADE961EC8EB4ADF8B4E4B3A40@phx.gbl>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BAY146-W49ADE961EC8EB4ADF8B4E4B3A40@phx.gbl>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
It is a very interesting suggestion to look to Vasiliuk with respect to the
intellectual issues here, Christine. The book is not widely available, I
believe. But in this group,
one never knows.
I have an old paperback copy, but perhaps there is a pdf? Is anyone in
touch with Fyodor V to find out if he would mind? He has the right to.
mike
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:27 AM, christine schweighart <
schweighartgate@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Andy,
> On appropriating motive Perhaps bringing in Fyodor Vasilyuk's ' The
> Psychology of Experiencing . An Analysis of how critical situations are
> dealt with' 1984/88 would be relevant. The theme goes back to the earlier
> thread of 'parallel' subjectivity of Gonzalez Rey from social relations ,
> Vasilyuk sees a relation between motive and 'values' :
>
> " In the first place, by the fact that values in themselves have no
> stimulating energy and force and therefore are incapable of directly
> compelling motives and behaviour to obey them.
> A value does, on the other hand, have the power to produce emotions, for
> instance if a choice already made is clearly in conflict with it. This
> means that the value must be taken ( in the terms of the psychological
> theory of activity) to be in the same category as motive, for emotions
> relate to separate activities, reflecting the course of their realisation
> of various motives..(.ref.)
> .....
> It is possible to suppose that in the course of individual development
> values undergo a definite evolution, changing not only in content but in
> motivational status as well, in the place they occupy and the role they
> play in the structure of life activity' p139
>
> Vasilyuk's interest in a critical-situation threshold and dealing with
> them is to be seen as an 'individual's investigation of the situation
> (which is ) not cognitive in intent, nor is it intellectual in method, it
> is trying to find answers not to universal questions but to questions of
> vital interest to the individual. It is not rational cognition, but probing
> of the internal and external bounds of possibility, a testing out of the
> world and of the self.' He refers to a coming up against a reality 'such as
> never was' always at a border line , which require creativity and can
> become growing points.
> In the book Vasilyuk explores 'frustration' suggests a 'typology of
> frustration behaviours'. then explores Conflict and Crisis, defence
> mechanisms. Related to ‘experiencing ‘ hedonist’ ‘realistic’ ‘value’ and
> ‘creative’ l experiencing. I was interested that he also tried to situate
> 'energy' into his schema.
>
> In Chapter 3 he considers these dynamics in ‘cultural-historical
> determination of experiencing – he goes on to explore archetypes and
> schemas or collective concepts for ‘depth of perspective of meaning’ –
> These 'schematisms of consciousness' / archetypes and he mentions a few
> examples of this kind - 'are able to serve as a form through which an
> individual makes sense of, or re-interprets, the events and circumstances
> of life, and are thus a culturally prescribed form for individual
> experiencing' one which he sharply differentiates from intellectual
> acquisition of knowledge, entering into 'not by mind alone but involves the
> whole of life', or an 'attuning' when 'one has attained a state of
> consciousness 'appropriate to the internal order of the schematism
> concerned'...'attuned ??.
> I hadn't read this mentioned much before I found my way to this book,
> seems very relevant to this discussion, though too much for me to take on
> at once. The focus that makes it interesting is that Vasilyuk is trying (
> at that time ) to look at ‘a life as a whole’, biography and critical
> situations. And struggles of realizing integrity.
> Christine.
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca