[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Further thoughts on Sfard's and Davydov's approaches to learning
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Further thoughts on Sfard's and Davydov's approaches to learning
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:00:33 -0700
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=qKeUEa+tf/S9oyRdzFo2uVYxNhkDP/ulXms4YC/6Sqc=; b=s3/eNAlzPdPZtNAphJavGYPiQ3iPnGD0q0uxik8nloj0lga8LCNqIOUfLJOYxCSD4U DgUOeIHBV9p0MO/Pi8ttQPz/a1e+w2PptoAA1CXlPOw/52Jjmx1gbZVbwSg9+CKWZuH1 y3HmmdUjqbXHgJ46B8BfK3bPwt126mZTAdpIg=
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTind_cM0nX-zG+JLg6h=Y-PLjaVgQw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BANLkTind_cM0nX-zG+JLg6h=Y-PLjaVgQw@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Why Ask Andy?
What does Anna say?
:-)
mike
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Larry Purss <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andy, some further thoughts on the topic you opened up on contrasting
> Anna's
> and Davydov's approaches to learning.
> I was not able to download Anna's article because of the way its formatted.
> However I went to Anna's website and have downloaded two of her articles
> and
> also the introductory chapter of her book written in 2008. [The first half
> of this book is elaborating her theoretical position that thinking IS
> communication, as particular forms of discourse]
> She says her approach is similar to Harre's approach to "discursive
> psychology" and both Anna and Harre definitely view thinking in a
> dialogical
> way as a particular form of conversation with one's self. Anna sees this
> communicative perspective on thinking as learning particular "forms of
> discourse" which have developed historically and now children must learn
> these particular discourse procedures through entering mathematical
> conversations as forms of social interaction in order to learn to think
> "mathematically".
>
> Andy, my understanding of Davydov and Gal'perin is that once "systems of
> discourse" have developed historically as "systems of meaning" it is far
> more efficient to start from the very beginning to introduce the entire
> system and not build up to the system perspective FROM the more concrete
> procedures such as counting objects. Therefore measurement [as
> fundamentally relational] is prior to counting.
>
> If I've got these basic premises of Anna's and Davydov's procedures
> accurate, do you see these procedural approaches as complimentary or are
> they challenging each others basic assumptions. If they are pointing to
> different procedures and assumptions of the best way to approach learning,
> then definitely this is a topic to tease out assumptions about fundamental
> concepts of learning?
>
> Larry
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca