[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Numbers - Natural or Real?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Numbers - Natural or Real?
- From: Larry Purss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:22:58 -0700
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wj4i+jzaacB8lNoD9JH3K4tWR0VBGp7oVmbzGvIYpL8=; b=M+yZXEL9uOQ1w39rhZcowwJ/Ic/WHt+8kGxBIm3Gg83A4jIOLbkmbgj3qM0AQjWSPO KrPifTDTgK4FGBj8uifhuntpGhOdi1JbcrtommG/iR6/C3Y+uY7Gvj4+nYSdrqlU+ACj W2CWP2B+38TMzczG/e//uqB8n46YHXjNJyNko=
- In-reply-to: <4E0C3966.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <4E0C3966.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: email@example.com
This is a wonderful question which i believe is full of possibility for
looking at certain basic ontological assumptions
A question I've been struggling with is the purpose of schools [as
institutions]? Is there primary mandate to teach "scientific concepts" or
is the search for recognition more fundamental?
I see a link between this question and your question on teaching numbers as
"activity" or "dialogue" [counting or rational]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Andy Blunden <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I don't really have an opinion on this matter, but I would be interested in
> listening in on those who may have an informed opinion.
> I see two different approaches to the teaching of mathematics.
> One takes the /Natural/ Numbers as the basic concept of the subject
> The Other takes the /Rational/ Numbers as the basic concept of the
> One takes /counting/ as the basic Action
> The Other takes /comparison/ of two lengths as the basic Action.
> One situates the basic Action within a /Discourse/
> The Other situates the basic Action within /Activity/
> One is represented by /Anna Sfard /(see
> One is represented by /V V Davydov/ (eg
> Now, I am not really interested in maths teaching, but I am interested in
> the relation between Discourse Analysis and Activity Theory. It seems to me
> that the two concepts, though different, are not at all incompatible.
> Perhaps practical experience with these two approaches would shed light on
> the relation between Discourse and Activity and how it could be best
> reflected in theory?
> Any thoughts my friends?
> *Andy Blunden*
> Joint Editor MCA: http://www.informaworld.com/**smpp/title~db=all~content=
> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
> Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.**aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857>
> MIA: http://www.marxists.org
> xmca mailing list
xmca mailing list