Nothing, Andy. That's why I want to oppose the ideal to the real,
and not to the material.
ARTEFACT:
Tool-artefact Utensil-artefact
(mass production) (personal consumption)
SIGN
Signal-sign Symbol-sign
(thing-thing) (meaning-meaning)]
MATERIALITY
Reality Ideality
(percepts) (concepts)
David Kellogg
Seoul National University of Education
--- On Mon, 10/18/10, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:
From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
Subject: Re: [xmca] Tom Toolery
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 7:02 PM
What would be an example of something which is ideal but not also
material, David?
andy
David Kellogg wrote: ...
It seems to me that if we follow Steve and Ilyenkov, and we see
problem after problem as a matter of establishing the interaction
of "ideal" and "material", we will need some kind of super-category
for the indivisible whole which both ideal and material make up.
Otherwise we really do fall into the worst kind of Cartesian
dualism. ...
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca