[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] The Missing Part
David:
This indeed is an important passage in understanding LSV's developmental
theories. But I believe cross-cultural research speerheaded by Cole and
others has discounted 'primitive' cultures as being less developed in
thought and practice when compared to 'western' culture. Or am I
misunderstanding your point?
eric
From: David Kellogg <vaughndogblack@yahoo.com>
To: xmca <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: 07/12/2010 02:38 AM
Subject: [xmca] The Missing Part
Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
This is the beginning of Chapter Two of Thinking and Speech that was not
translated into English. I posted it once several years ago, and Anton
thought it didn't add very much.
I think it does: it structures the whole chapter, because it makes it
clear that Freud, Levy-Bruhl, and Blondel share a common idealist basis as
well as a common canonical stature.
≪Мы полагаем, . говорит он, . что настанет день, когда мысль ребенка по
отношению к мысли нормального цивилизованного взрослого будет помещена в
ту же плоскость, в какой находится ≪примитивное мышление≫,
охарактеризованное Леви-Брюлем, или аутистическая и символическая мысль,
описанная Фрейдом и его учениками, или ≪болезненное сознание≫, если
только это понятие, введенное Блонделем, не сольется в один прекрасный
день с предыдущим понятием≫ (1, с.408).1 Действительно, появление его
первых работ по историческому значению
этого факта для дальнейшего развития психологической мысли должно быть по
справедливости сопоставлено и сравнено с датами выхода в свет ≪Les
fonctions mentales dans les societes inferieures≫ Леви-Брюля, ≪Т
олкования сновидений≫ Фрейда или ≪La conscience morbide≫ Блонделя.
Больше того, между этими явлениями в различнейших областях научной
психологии есть не только внешнее сходство, определяемое уровнем их
исторического значения, но глубокое, кровное, внутреннее родство . связь
по самой сути заключенных и воплощенных в них философских и
психологических тенденций. Недаром сам Пиаже в огромной мере опирался в
своих исследованиях и построениях на эти три
работы и на их авторов.
“It is therefore our belief", says (Piaget), "that the day will come when
child thought will be placed on the same level in relation to adult,
normal, and civilized thought as ‘primitive mentality’, as defined by
Lévy-Bruhl, as autistic and symbolical thought as described by Freud and
his disciples and as ‘morbid consciousness,’ assuming that this last
concept, which we owe to M. Ch. Blondel, is not simply fused with the
former.” (p. 201-202). In reality, the appearance of this first works, in
regard to the historic importance as a fact for future reference in the
development of psychological thought must be on the compared with the
appearance of “Les fonctions mentales dans les societes inferieures” of
Levi- Bruhl, Freud’s “The interpretation of dreams’, or Blondel’s “La
conscience morbide”. It is not simply that between these phenomena in the
development of the field of scientific psychology there is a formal
resemblance, determined by their level of historic importance, but that
there is a deep, internal kinship, a connection in essence which is
visible in their philosophical and psychological tendencies. Not without
reason does Piaget himself base in enormous measure his own studies and
constructions on these three works and on their authors.
Last night I was re-reading Bleuler's criticisms of Freud in "Autistic
Thinking" and I also came upon these words, which Vygotsky quotes
approvingly.
"Examining the more grown-up child, I also do not much observe that he
would prefer the imaginary apple to the real. The imbecile and the savage
are alike practitioners of Realpolitik and the latter, (exactly like us,
who stand at the apex of cognitive ability) makes his autistic stupidities
only in such cases when reason and experience prove insufficient: in his
ideas about the universe, about the phenomena of nature, in his
understanding of diseases and other blows of destiny, in adopting measures
to shield himself from them, and in other relationships which are too
complex for him.”
It seems to me that here and elsewhere in this chapter Bleuler is arguing
for, and Vygotsky is agreeing with, a position that is simultaneously
universalist, relativist, and developmentalist. It is universalist in the
sense that it argues for a universal human autistic response to areas of
experience of which we are ignorant. It is relativist in the sense that it
argues for the independence of an "autistic" response from rationality and
an autonomous art and autonomous humanities based on that independence
that is in no way subordinate to rationality. It is developmentalist in
the sense that it argues for an autistic response which develops out of a
narrow, immediately realistic (perception based?) reality function rather
than vice versa (as in Freud, Janet, and Levy-Bruhl).
David Kellogg
Seoul National University of Education
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca