mike cole wrote:
Perhaps I am agreeing with Andy about the linkages between institutions
and
concepts, which is also a linkage between activities and concepts.
Mike, I would like to mention the following semantic connections which I
think CHAT needs to pay attention to if we are to talk to the numerous other
currents who share our domain of enquiry.
Institution = Discourse (Foucault)
= Practico-intert (Sartre)
= Object (Hegel)
= Activity (ANL, def. by object)
= Genre (Bakhtin)
= Frame (Goffman)
= Tradition (Gadamer)
= Figured world (D Holland)
= Activity System (Engestrom?)
= Social formation (Marx)
= Field (Bourdieu)
which is a dead or solidified ...?
Project for Schmit
for Hegelians like Pinkard and Andy
for Existentialists (Sartre, Heidegger?)
Gestalt des consciousness for Hegel
momentary = context
= situation
Projects & Institutions have as Units ... ?
= Concept
= Action (ANL)
= Text?
obviously none of the = are really =, because they involve different
conceptual frames. Which is my point, I guess.
Andy
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca