[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] "Semiotic analysis" or "Semic analysis"?
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] "Semiotic analysis" or "Semic analysis"?
- From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:34:01 -0800
- Cc: Boris Meshcheryakov <borlogic@yahoo.com>
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5W8eWHiMnq93sQeGQiVQiescpeUzt/ZBiWnwCFYlluA=; b=EkDZNnXNuHHHioZMpNWxnGmueDjzSA0j8+61RX/D0wPZgS/cUP95bl+hXlfIm/FKSf wE4Bue36yEoYzoQzbuD6VKPm96XtWkukmMlpdE/fXKAYowP1g2EhwucpMqI2z/ZvN1xN a+toSFziADcI2EiqI04uZ/8DvAANsk6N/9WqY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=FjzLh7tGbzuFOGHbrsjwdJl/ikjwP0VeGCISNIpyKTlvuh+DJJWNX7/cU7Hf1/iepu WqfZhk17Hd45l3XZ/wg7de7zO4kkNmIcUqH0Bin01/Dhb8aym5zMl59iu4MPAZHtznFH RM8BQbPIMT2vYwt7DbQGsFhWW4gYp8lJSbTX4=
- In-reply-to: <BAY121-W5041B2D98A7677403119D792520@phx.gbl>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BAY121-W5041B2D98A7677403119D792520@phx.gbl>
- Reply-to: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Achilles. I do not know the answer to your question. Lets see what our
native
Russian speakers can tell us.
mike
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Achilles Delari Junior <
achilles_delari@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, XMCA,
>
>
>
> Please,
>
>
>
> In some inner meetings of Vygotsky's group, around 1932-33-34, there was an
> interesting claim from him about methodological problem of the analysis:
> "Семический
> анализ есть единственный адекватный метод изучения системного и смыслового
> строения сознания" = something like: "[Semicheskii] analysis is the only
> adequate method for the study of the systemic and [smyslovoe] structure [or
> construction (?) = stroenie]" of consciousness - Well, in my Portuguese
> version I have a great problem not exactly because "stroenie" translation as
> "structure" - spite the word is not "struktura" - but mainly with
> "semicheskii" that was translated as "semiotic" and Vygotsky's word was not
> "semioticheskii" - French version translate the same "semitcheskii" has
> "sémantique" - but this is not so comfortable too, because "smyslovoe" in
> Portuguese was transformed in "semantic" too. But there is "semantika" and
> "semanticheskii" in Russian too, at least in present time. I don't know
> about actual familiarity of Vygotsky with terms such as "semiotics",
> "semantics", and so on, at that time... How can we better translate
> "semicheskii analiz" today? Or, even better: by what methodological means
> did somebody actually proceed that kind of so important analysis, at that
> times? To what methodology Vygotsky concretely refereed with the term
> "semicheskii analiz" - "the only adequate method for the study of the
> systemic and "semantic" [smyslovoe] "construction" [stroenie] of
> consciousness"... The only title in Russian around this matter that in find
> in Google search was: Аснин, В. И. & Запорожец, А. В. (1935). Семический
> анализ языковых значений, усвоенных в школе. Сборник исследований
> харьковской группы; не был опубликован - something like Asnin, V.I &
> Zaporozhets, A.V. (1935) Semicheskii analysis of linguistic (?) meanings,
> adopted in school. Collection of investigations of Kharkov's group. ---> but
> this was not published... Can I suppose that not only Vygotsky believed that
> "semicheskii analysis" was important, but even some people apply it in
> empirical research? Ow, sure... I can found many entries to "semic
> analysis" in contemporary semiotic studies, but seems to be no much in a
> "genetic" approach... then I am very limited in choice an adequate
> translation, and even more limited in understand the actual concept...
> "semiotic analysis"(?), "analyse sémantique"(?), "semic analysis"(?) - this
> was not any kind of "concept formation" study, was it?
>
>
>
> Thank you for your help, one more time.
>
>
>
> Achilles.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> No Messenger você pode tranformar sua imagem de exibição num vídeo. Veja
> aqui!
>
> http://www.windowslive.com.br/public/tip.aspx/view/97?product=2&ocid=WindowsLive:Dicas - Imagem Dinamica:Hotmail:Tagline:1x1:Mexa-se
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca