Kinda of makes you want to create a sort of "Amnesty International"
for
educators denied freedom of professional expression.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-
bounces@weber.ucsd.edu]
On Behalf Of Peter Smagorinsky
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 5:41 AM
To: 'langandlit'; 'lego'; 'ELAN7408-Fall09'; 'Hillocks'; 'eXtended
Mind,
Culture, Activity'
Subject: [xmca] FW: AWADmail Issue 380
More administrative wisdom: The following is from the wordsmith.org
"A
word
a day" weekly letters-to-the-editor feature. More reason to bang your
head
against the wall this week.
_____
From: James Eng (jameseng hotmail.com)
Subject: frustration
Not frustration with you! Rather, frustration with the powers-that-be
here
at the middle school where I work. For over a year, I've shared my
love
for
A.Word.A.Day with my students and I have had much positive feedback
regarding the words, the clever and creative weekly themes, and the
downright interesting, thought-provoking word choices. But a single
parent
has complained and now I find myself in a morass of having to justify
what I
do in the class, provide documentation that shows there is, indeed,
value to
what we do in class, to ultimately prove that our attempts to
"control"
language via ANY vocabulary program will always be imperfect
because the
evolution of communication is ongoing and, in the end, best
experienced
rather than caged. Sigh. It seems that there's no incentive to think
outside
boundaries or to innovate. It appears that people want something
simple,
quick, and cut and dried. Well, whatever may be, I will continue to
anticipate the words with eagerness. I guess I must accept that at
times, my
views are "antipodal" to those of others.
Ironically, the parent's complaint is based on the argument that the
words
are not usable for the kids, that they're not grade appropriate,
which I
know is something similar that you all at Wordsmith.org have
experience
with. Also, that the use of the Wordsmith.org material is from a
website
"not approved", by the district, and that it is not entirely in line
with
the school curriculum. And the entirely laughable notion that the
kids
may
be exposed to "inappropriate material"! I thought that the basis of
ANY
language arts curriculum is an exploration of language and the
interesting
patterns that we notice along the way. Is there anyone in this
world who
is
100% fluent with any language?
Really, if this is examined closely, this incident is not about
vocabulary,
or curriculum or any of the other stated things. Rather, it's about
authority and power. It's about people whose self-esteem and
confidence
level are based solely on how high they can make people jump. Sad.
The kids and I discussed "Beau Brummell" the other day and they
created
visual representations of the word.
Update:
Having had a one and a half hour meeting with our school's language
arts
supervisor, a meeting replete with many, many examples of students'
work
that clearly demonstrates an active interaction with the vocabulary
words
from Wordsmith.org, I was told that administration in the building,
"will
not approve your vocabulary program". I am flabbergasted at such a
statement
given that administration has no clue as to what my vocabulary
program
entails, nor have they shown the least bit of interest in finding
out in
the
past 1+ years that I've been running my program. So, I am writing
to you
for
advice. I need to know a really terrific word that is synonymous
with,
"manufactured", since it seems that the so-called leaders of the
school
are
devoted, lock, stock, and barrel to such an approach. I am stunned
that
such
obtuseness has become so prevalent and in my 17 years as an
educator I
am
speechless regarding the state of middle school education in my
neck of
the
woods.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca