[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Re: Kant and the Strange Situation
- To: haydizulfei@yahoo.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Re: Kant and the Strange Situation
- From: Wolff-Michael Roth <mroth@uvic.ca>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:02:58 -0800
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=2007001; d=ucsd.edu; c=simple; q=dns; b=XCbsBZ7k1dIXcLwzuFZeTqcs5uVNYKKvHC5Q3hMWSo5grW6YAdV9aJAFqGBs2l34D nnDuZn8aotwrPbz+7tYwg==
- In-reply-to: <710316.43056.qm@web46410.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <710316.43056.qm@web46410.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Hi there,
the German word is interesting, because "Wider" means against,
opposite, and is used as such in all other composite nouns. There is
a "Spiegelung" and the verb "spiegeln."
If the construction is as it is in the other words, the "wider" may
actually indicate a radical and oppositive difference between the
original and that which is reflected, i.e., the Spiegelbild.
Kant uses "Reflexion"
michael
On 5-Jan-09, at 11:06 AM, Haydi Zulfei wrote:
Martin,
What do you want to explicate ?
You have had this :
[[Reflection (German: Widerspiegelung; Russian: otrazhenie)
"A basic concept of the materialist theory of knowledge and its core -
the theory of reflection. The dialectical materialist theory of
reflection distinguishes between reflection in inorganic nature, on
the one hand, and in living nature and social life, on the other,
where it is active and is exercised by highly organised systems
possessing an independent force of reaction, such as biological
metabolism at the lowest level and the deliberate creative,
anticipative and transformative activity of man at the highest.
In inorganic nature reflection is the property of things to
reproduce, under the influence of other things, such traces, imprints
and reactions whose structure accords with some quality of the things
that exercise the influence. But these imprints are not utilised by
the things themselves. In living nature they are used for self-
preservation and self-adaptation, e.g., the irritability of plants
and simple organisms.
Psychic reflection develops with the appearance and evolution of the
nervous system and brain, through which the higher nervous
conditioned reflex and psychic activity is exercised, securing the
behavioural orientation and regulation of a subject-organism in the
environment. The psychic reflection of men and animals has two sides:
1) content and 2) form, i.e., the mode of existence, expression and
transformation of this content. Human knowledge differs in quality
from the psychic reflection of animals because it is social by
nature" (Frolov, 1984: 353).]]
Neither Frolov was out of his senses in giving the definition nor
Charles Tolman . What else do you want ? You can come up with your
critical points on the definition and we will then understand what
your original idea is . Reading the first line takes you right to
your destination .
You have read many times and times :
*Ideality is the subjective reflection of the objective world* . Your
reasons why this is not true/practically logical # formally logical ,
the latter you renounced recently . My problem is the *genesis* or
*genetics* of *culture* . It's everything ; but where does it come
from ? You think I'm too alien to this idea I've not got my answer so
far ?? BTW *reflection as you do know *does have effect* but that's
what entails from *reflection* ; That effect is ultimate
*reification* , the endpoint of one round of *ideality* , at the
level of analysis .
With Very Best Wishes
Haydi
--- On Mon, 1/5/09, Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> wrote:
From: Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu>
Subject: Re: [xmca] Re: Kant and the Strange Situation
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 3:10 AM
Thanks, Ed. I'm reading the dictionary definition of 'reflection,'
and
there's nothing even close to 'having an effect.' But I've
surfed around and
the word is indeed translated as reflection. Does your Russian
dictionary
provide any more detail?
Martin
On 1/4/09 9:12 PM, "Ed Wall" <ewall@umich.edu> wrote:
Martin
It appears the root is more or less
отрaжáть (отрaзить)
and, at least according to my dictionary, has the sense of reflecting
or having an effect. However, my qualifications are dated.
Ed
On Jan 4, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
At the end of last year several of us were trying to figure out
whether
'reflection' is a good term to translate the way Vygotsky and
leontiev wrote
about 'mental' activity. Michael Roth pointed out that the
German
word that
Marx used was Widerspiegeln rather than Reflektion (see below). I
don't
think anyone identified the Russian word that was used. I still
haven't
found time to trace the word in Vygotsky's texts, English and
Russian. But
an article by Charles Tolman suggests that the Russian term was
'otrazhenie.' Online translators don't like this word:
can any
Russian
speakers suggest how it might be translated?
Reflection (German: Widerspiegelung; Russian: otrazhenie)
Tolman, C.W. (1988). The basic vocabulary of Activity Theory.
Activity
Theory, 1, 14-20.
Martin
On 10/25/08 12:40 PM, "Wolff-Michael Roth"
<mroth@uvic.ca> wrote:
Hi Martin,
Marx does indeed use the term "widerspiegeln" in the
sentence you
cite.
Das Gehirn der
Privatproduzenten spiegelt diesen doppelten gesellschaftlichen
Charakter ihrer Privatarbeiten nur wider in den Formen, welche im
praktischen Verkehr, im Produktenaustausch erscheinen - den
gesellschaftlich
nützlichen Charakter ihrer Privatarbeiten also in
der Form, daß das Arbeitsprodukt nützlich sein muß, und zwar
für
andre - den gesellschaftlichen Charakter der Gleichheit der
verschiedenartigen
Arbeiten in der Form des gemeinsamen Wertcharakters
dieser materiell verschiednen Dinge, der Arbeitsprodukte.
But the Duden, the reference work of German language says that
there
are 2 different senses. One is reflection as in a mirror, the
other
one that something brings to expression. In this context, I do not
see Marx draw on the mirror idea.
For those who have trouble, perhaps the analogy with mathematical
functions. In German, what a mathematical function does is
"abbilden," which is, provide a projection of, or
reflection, or
whatever. You have the word Bild, image, picture in the verb. But
when you look at functions, only y = f(x) = x, or -x gives you
what
you would get in the mirror analogy. You get very different things
when you use different functions, log functions, etc. Then the
relationship between the points on a line no longer is the same in
the "image", that is, the target domain.
We sometimes see the word "refraction" in the works of
Russian
psychologists, which may be better than reflection. It allows you
to
think of looking at the world through a kaleidoscope, and you get
all
sorts of things, none of which look like "the real
thing."
Michael
On 25-Oct-08, at 9:01 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
Michael,
Here's one example from Marx, and several from Leontiev, if we
can
get into
the Russian too.
"The twofold social character of the labour of the individual
appears to
him, when *reflected* in his brain, only under those forms which
are
impressed upon that labour in every-day practice by the exchange
of
products." Marx, Capital, Chapter 1, section 4.
" Activity is a non-additive unit of the corporeal, material
life
of the
material subject. In the narrower sense, i.e., on the
psychological
plane,
it is a unit of life, mediated by mental *reflection*, by an
*image,*
whose
real function is to orientate the subject in the objective
world."
Leontiev,
Activity & Consciousness.
" The circular nature of the processes effecting the
interaction of
the
organism with the environment has been generally acknowledged. But
the main
thing is not this circular structure as such, but the fact that
the
mental
*reflection* of the objective world is not directly generated by
the
external influences themselves, but by the processes through which
the
subject comes into practical contact with the objective world, and
which
therefore necessarily obey its independent properties,
connections,
and
relations." ibid
" Thus, individual consciousness as a specifically human form
of the
subjective *reflection* of objective reality may be understood
only
as the
product of those relations and mediacies that arise in the course
of the
establishment and development of society." ibid
Martin
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca