Thanks for remembering, bb.
What do people have to say about this??
mike
?
On 10/30/06, bb <xmca-whoever@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> Valsiner's article looks interesting and could be a fun read. I totally
> agree with his acknowledgments, but find the other aspects of the article
> arguable. The paper is here in the archives for those who did not get it in
> the mail:
>
>
> http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Mail/Current.Mail/att-0271/00-Process_structure_Valsiner.pdf
>
> In November I expect this link to change to:
>
>
> http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Mail/xmcamail.2006_10.dir/att-0271/00-Process_structure_Valsiner.pdf
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Mike Cole" <lchcmike@gmail.com>
> > Fine with me. Of great interest locally. Should we post on xmca papers
> to
> > read?
> > A new issue of MCA with relevant articles about to come out, but this is
> in
> > the
> > oven so why not start half baking commentary as you like, erit et al.
> > mike
> >
> > On 10/30/06, ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org <ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I know that other subjects have been on the front burner of XMCA and
> have
> > > withheld any further posts regarding Valsiner's paper. If there is
> still
> > > interest I would be happy to do my best.
> > >
> > > eric
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > xmca mailing list
> > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 01:00:15 PST