Yes,
Valsiner's article looks interesting and could be a fun read. I totally agree with his acknowledgments, but find the other aspects of the article arguable. The paper is here in the archives for those who did not get it in the mail:
http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Mail/Current.Mail/att-0271/00-Process_structure_Valsiner.pdf
In November I expect this link to change to:
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Mike Cole" <lchcmike@gmail.com>
> Fine with me. Of great interest locally. Should we post on xmca papers to
> read?
> A new issue of MCA with relevant articles about to come out, but this is in
> the
> oven so why not start half baking commentary as you like, erit et al.
> mike
>
> On 10/30/06, ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org <ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I know that other subjects have been on the front burner of XMCA and have
> > withheld any further posts regarding Valsiner's paper. If there is still
> > interest I would be happy to do my best.
> >
> > eric
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 01:00:15 PST