I completely agree with Stetsenko's proposal that we need to understand not
just the way subjectivity is a product of history, but how history is a
product of subjectivity (to put it in a simplified way).
Martin
On 10/30/05 10:31 AM, "Mary K. Bryson" <mary.bryson@ubc.ca> wrote:
> ...
> So, in this group, I would argue that the community could open up
> participation directly by actually taking up the scholarship of someone who
> at present, is not being read as if she were, even potentially, a legitimate
> central intellectual figure in the "front stage" of CHAT -- Stetsenko. And
> what might it look like to read Stetsenko's work not just in terms of what
> she has to say about Vygotsky +++ but about say, subjectivity and its
> materiality.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 01:00:22 PST