Re: distribution and exchange

[Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>]

A straight triangle? Good luck!
:-)
mike


On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:18:43 +0700, Phil Chappell
<phil_chappell@access.inet.co.th> wrote:
>  
> Given that I just "borrowed" that triangle for a paper, I would certainly
> like to get things straight! 
>   
> Phil 
>  
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Wolff-Michael Roth 
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu 
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 11:40 PM 
> Subject: Re: distribution and exchange 
> 
> Hi Yrjö,
> sorry to have missed you in Helsinki. It was interesting meeting all the
> students and staff. I hope you are having a good time writing in the warmer
> climes of Italy.
> The website with the EXCHANGE in a different subtriangle is on the website
> URL: http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/chatanddwr/activitysystem/.
> It is different from those that you had in your 1987 or 1993 (testbench)
> texts.
> I am very much interested in receiving a copy of the paper.
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> 
> On 12-Nov-04, at 8:29 AM, Yrjö Engeström wrote:
> 
>  
> Michael, if exchange has jumped from the S-C-Rules subtriangle to C-O-DivLab
> subtriangle, it is a mistake committed by someone who made the graphics for
> the web page. Please tell me where this faulty diagram is exactly and I'll
> get it fixed.
> 
> As to your question, you might be interested in a new paper in which I
> discuss the spheres of production, exchange, consumption (though not
> distribution) - and not using the triangle this time. The paper is titled
> VALUES, RUBBISH, AND WORKPLACE LEARNING and I'll be happy to send it to you
> if you want.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Yrjö
> 
> 
> 
> Wolff-Michael Roth kirjoittaa perjantaina, 12. marraskuuta 2004, kello
> 16:44:
> 
>  
> Hi,
> I had some trouble with remembering where in YE's triangle go the terms
> DISTRIBUTION and EXCHANGE. Today I realized for the first time that YE used
> to have EXCHANGE in the S-C-RULES subtriangle but on the website has it in
> the C-O-DivLab subbtriangle.
> Does anyone have an idea when this change happened and why it happened?
> Has anyone worked on the fact whether it made sense to overlay
> production-consumption-exchange-distribution, which Marx discussed at the
> society level onto YE's triangle, which deals with any local, concretely
> realized activity?
> Thanks for any pointers.
> Michael
> 
>