In a message dated 11/16/2002 10:57:18 AM Central Standard Time,
mcole@weber.ucsd.edu writes:
> Darn. We need to develop to the point where we can
> pinpoint clear disagreements so we might make a little progress toward more
> secure knowledge.
>
Mike;
Perhaps I have a legitimate disagreement in our views. You appear very
resilent to giving up the strength of activity as the unit and push hard for
qualitative understanding of all degrees of activity. I would want to stress
that meaning making is extremely important in this process and that activity
void of meaning making will lack attention and slow progress toward the very
important idea of mastering one's behavior. I would appreciate commentary on
this issue or you can always direct me a spot where you have addressed this,
I like to read your ideas.
eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 01:00:08 PST