Hi Yrjo--
Can you explain how the discussion of rules and voting can alienate many
xmca members and why specifically non-Americans?
Eugene
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yrjö Engeström [mailto:yrjo.engestrom@helsinki.fi]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 4:54 PM
> To: ematusov@UDel.Edu; xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: Re: VOTE ON RULES FOR XMCA!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Importance: High
>
>
> At the risk of sounding destructive, I think this business about rules and
> voting is crazy and alienates many xmca members, in particular
> non-Americans.
>
> Too bad.
>
> Yrjo Engestrom
>
> ----------
> >From: "Eugene Matusov" <ematusov@udel.edu>
> >To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> >Subject: VOTE ON RULES FOR XMCA!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >Date: ti 29. helmi 2000 08:18
> >
>
> > Hi everybody--
> >
> > I designed a voting booth so we can vote on rules at
> > http://www.freevote.com/booth/xmca_rules
> >
> > Please email me after you voted so I can count how many people voted.
> >
> > You can add voting items (please number and sign your rule
> item). So, it
> > makes sense to revisit the voting booth after a while to vote
> on new items
> > suggested by people.
> >
> > Try to remember how many items there were when you voted so you
> won't vote
> > twice the same items when you revisited the booth. You do not
> need send me
> > another message if you voted on new items after revisiting the
> voting booth.
> >
> > Please, ignore the running ads -- I'm using the commercial website for
> > creating the voting booth.
> >
> > Let me know if you have a question, concern, or suggestion
> about the booth.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Eugene
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Dillon [mailto:dillonph@northcoast.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:02 AM
> >> To: XMCA
> >> Subject: Re: Paul -- on the rules proposal?
> >
> >> I did see that there were a number of different proposals and
> >> given that the number of people participating in the discussion
> >> represented
> >> at best 5 percent of the people subscribed to xmca, I didn't really
> >> take any single proposal as very representative. I admit to not
> >> having read
> >> completely: was there some consensus? How many consensed?
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 17:54:16 PST