[Xmca-l] Re: Chat Diagrams

[Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>]

Garry, see http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/ch2.htm
Figure 2.6 is the original. And in this chapter you can follow the 
derivation of the triangle, in which is makes a lot of sense than if you 
just come across it as a finished product.

Andy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
http://home.mira.net/~andy/


Garry O'Dell wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am a later in life arrival to the academic world and in particular to Cultural Historical Activity Theory.
>
> I am using CHAT as a conceptual framework to explore and understand the activity of land use assessment for events such as markets, festivals, rallies and the like in Australia, with a focus on the activity as it is applied by local government in New South Wales. My level of theoretical thinking is naive and would benefit from some elder input.
>
> My intital confusion is the Engestrom triangle.
>
> Its depiction seems to vary from a triangle with lines to double headed arrows depicting some type of relationships. Is there an agreed depiction of the triangle or is this subject to dispute and conjecture?
>
> My reading to date supports the view that learning is the key focus of CHAT with some excursions into organisation. Given the wealth of knowledge in the XCMA group, I would be interested to determine whether any researcher is currently using CHAT on land use decision making.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Garry O'Dell
>
> Ph. 0412439589
>
> Doctoral Candidate
> Newcastle Business School
> Faculty of Business and Law
> University of Newcastle NSW Australia
>
>   

Status: O