[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Finland
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Finland
- From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:45:42 +1000
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <51E65ACF.1020902@kolumbus.fi>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <51D2FCD1.9080900@dolphy.eclipse.co.uk> <FA9AE5A462B94F449F9FB7C115169F0309B7CF1C@exch-mbx-01.utu.fi> <0EE899BB-CFB3-4F17-810C-C9F2460EA0FB@telia.com> <CAB+ZxWu3DV_Fx+=MxVXWOBk58L-sB6GogZ0v4NifMF3Z2eU64Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAB+ZxWtjjFxo=08_eENQuZX71E4SkgnWMr=89=hYrRndivFeMQ@mail.gmail.com> <7C86404A-698A-44B3-B964-157FF9AC58F3@gmail.com> <CAGaCnpyqLoWaoGgov--DwcTRbn=5je9aMFHMyEManng5LWqWbg@mail.gmail.com> <51E65ACF.1020902@kolumbus.fi>
- Reply-to: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
The Guardian article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jul/01/education-michael-gove-finland-gcse
is very interesting in fact! Jaana, Antti, Jaakko, and the other Finns
on this list. What do you make of the analysis given in this article?
Andy
Jaana Pirkkalainen wrote:
Hi,
this is a comment on this topic. It seems a bit odd and strangely
funny to read this discussion on Finnish educational system. That's
beacause I myself have lived through the development (or
non-development) of it, first as a child and then as a mother.Not that
much has happend since my school years in the 1960's and -70's
comparing the exeperience of my son's path and struggling some ten
years back.
Firstly one should distinguishe the political struggle for the change
of doubleschooling system during the 1960's and -70's. And then the
struggle tangled with teachers education.
Until 1968 Finland had a doubleschooling system. Children entered
school at the age of seven (as still is the case) and went trhough for
next four grades together in "kansakoulu" (meaning some what like
nationschool). Then there was the split to either grammar school (in
Finnish oppikoulu) which were mostly private schools, with few
exceptions (state schools) and to "kansalaiskoulu" (no English
translation for that, meaning citizens school) which was a continuum
of "kansakoulu" for next four years.
Grammar school was private school leading to higher education, and
"kansalaiskoulu" was towards vocational education. So working class
children went to "kansalaiskoulu" and then straight to work or
vocational education to become joiners, auto mechanics, waitresses and
so on. And the upper and middle class children went to grammar
schools, then to high scool and then to universites or second grade
vocational schools and became nurses, engineers and so on.
1968 law of Primary school was established and in 1972 started the
implementation of the law.
But it was not the good will of the teachers, or professors of
education that made it happen. It was a strong leftist struggle for
equal rights for every kid to educate themselves, and also still the
postwar situation of the nation in some sense too. (Everybody of
course knows Finland's brother-in arms- relation with the Third Reich
and the defeat in 1944 and then peace treaty with the Soviet Union)
The opposition for the primary school act was harsh, and the teachers
education was tangled with that backlash. The business elite, some
professors of education and right wing politicians set up a foundation
called Support Foundation for Free Schooling (Vapaan koulutuksen
tukisäätiö), which had its primary reestablish private schools,
testing and assesment. They did this by influencing the teachers
education system. The Foundation ceased operating in 1991. By then
they had been able to change the course of the development of Finnish
educational system at least in three levels. Firstly they were able to
intervene the selection of the students for teacher education in
universities, secondly they had a strong hold of the educational
departments and thirdly they managed to take over most of the
educational admiministration.
This is a very short and brief overview of post-war Finland, the main
poin being that Finnish sosciety is still or again struggling the same
issues as back then. The romanticizing "branding" of Finland or its
educational system is *not* -- for many parts -- true today.Or has
ever been.
Socioeconomical status and residential area are linked the overall
well being of children as they are all over the world. But what is
quite incompatible with the goals and intentions for the Primary
School Act in 1968 -- parents education still designate their
childrens educational and vocational path.
So Finland with its educational system is not a dream land. Sorry to
disappoint you folks, the struggle goes on!
- Jaana
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Book: http://www.brill.nl/concepts
http://marxists.academia.edu/AndyBlunden