[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Levy-Bruhl, "primitivism", progress and etc.
I would just like to say a few words in defense of changing the heading on threads, something which I have often incurred Mike's ire by doing.
I recognize why Mike dislikes this and I sympathize.It does indeed make it much harder to follow the thread, to archive it, and to find a thread that you want to refer to (for example, if you look at Tammy's digest of our conversation you will notice that the subthread "Progress: Illusion or Reality" is entirely missing).
It also emphasizes individuality and even quirkiness (singletons rather than waves in the ether) and even suggests that our list is not a continuous conversation but only a set of speeches by people largely talking past each other.
All of these are heavy criticisms and major drawbacks. But I still think that conversations are every bit as much about TENSION as about COHERENCE--they are about VARIATION as much as REPETITION. In fact, I rather think the tension is more important than the coherence, and the variation more essential than the repetition.
Sometime in the twenties, N. Ia. Marr, who participated in Vygotsky's seminar on semiotics alongside people like Sergei Eisenstein, suggested that we perform the Gedankenexperiment of imagining a language that consists of a single word, to be differently intoned.
Marr suggested that this is what early man's speech must have been like (and he even pointed to the fact that the child's first language is precisely of this nature). He asked if such a one word lexicon could be considered a complete language.
I think that Voloshinov and Vygotsky, on the basis of Dostoevsky example of the drunken workmen (cited, identically, in Marxism and the Philosophy of Language and in Chapter Seven of Thinking and Speech) would concur: The answer is yes, because the essence of language is really the mutable formulation and not the self-identical form. But if they had posted this answer to Marr's question on a listserv, they would have given it different subject lines.
David Kellogg
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
--- On Fri, 3/2/12, Anthony Barra <tub80742@temple.edu> wrote:
From: Anthony Barra <tub80742@temple.edu>
Subject: Re: [xmca] Levy-Bruhl, "primitivism", progress and etc.
To: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: Friday, March 2, 2012, 4:32 PM
Quite helpful! Thank you, Tammy.
Anthony
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:28 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tammy Powell created this summary of the discussion up to recently. It is
> still moving in a couple of threads, at least. Perhaps having it brought
> together like this would be helpful to others? Or is it a distraction in
> the flow?
> mike
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tamara Powell <tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [xmca] Levy-Bruhl, concrete psychology and "primitivism"
> To: lchcmike@gmail.com, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
>
>
> Okay, here's the updated versions. I added Larry Purss' comment from a day
> ago.
>
> Tammy :)
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:10 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, thenh. Tammy Make small changes Andy suggested and send out to me,
> As
> > life allows, I will read, listen, watch, and deal with it.
> > mike
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I hesitate to enter this kitchen.
> >> Couple of comments. The vimeo link appears a second time. Not required.
> >> *words inside asterisks* can be bold.
> >>
> >> I guess when it's complete, put it on the web site and send a message to
> >> the list about it,
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> mike cole wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks a lot, Tammy. I am going to cc Andy on this.
> >>>
> >>> Andy, the idea is to pull together a bunch of different, but
> >>> interrelated, threads so that the overall topic is more visible.
> >>> I gotta get off line, but this needs purusing. It should be fed
> >>> back into xmca.
> >>> mike
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Tamara Powell <
> >>> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com<
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hey Mike,
> >>>
> >>> Here's a .pdf and .docx with all three conversations and with
> >>> notes about where conversations split/go to.
> >>>
> >>> I hope this is helpful!
> >>>
> >>> Tammy
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:42 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:lchcmike@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Its not a hurry up thing, but a thing to be done. An example
> >>> of how a single discussion that is really worthwhile is
> >>> degraded by different headers etc, and confusions. ..... but
> >>> with some effort, the core topic can be discerned and maybe
> >>> some knowledge crystalized.
> >>> mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Tamara Powell
> >>> <tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com <
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> No problem, should be fine. I probably won't be able to
> >>> finish until tomorrow afternoon, but I'll try to figure
> >>> out a good way to condense things.
> >>>
> >>> Tammy :)
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:14 PM, mike cole
> >>> <lchcmike@gmail.com <mailto:lchcmike@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If you can. I think they are all part of the same
> >>> topic. Am i nuts?
> >>> m,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Tamara Powell
> >>> <tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com<
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The two other threads I see that seem connected
> >>> are:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [xmca] Bateson's distinction between digital and
> >>> analog
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [xmca] Levy-Bruhl, concrete psychology and
> >>> "primitivism" (was: Re: [xmca] Bateson's
> >>> distinction between digital and analog)
> >>>
> >>> Do you want me to put all three threads together?
> >>>
> >>> Tammy
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:40 PM, mike cole
> >>> <lchcmike@gmail.com <mailto:lchcmike@gmail.com>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Beautiful, but there is stuff by kellog on
> >>> this I am pretty
> >>> sure. Check the archive for about past two
> weeks.
> >>> m
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Tamara Powell
> >>> <tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com<
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>> How's this? Do you want me or you to send
> >>> it?
> >>>
> >>> Tammy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:03 PM, mike
> >>> cole <lchcmike@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:lchcmike@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Tammy-- Could you find a way to make a
> >>> single document that contains this
> >>> discussion and the link to the vimeo
> >>> to send out to xmca. I am really
> >>> interested in getting the discussion
> >>> straight, but l am way too
> >>> pressed to go back and make a coherent
> >>> set. Could you?
> >>> mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM,
> >>> Steve Gabosch <stevegabosch@me.com
> >>> <mailto:stevegabosch@me.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Martin, to supplement your
> >>> analysis below, could you attach,
> >>> or copy to text the slide you used
> >>> at ISCAR quoting the babalawo
> >>> teaching his client about the
> >>> astral? It can be read but not
> >>> all at once in the Vimeo - which I
> >>> highly recommend, btw (only 20
> >>> minutes long) - thank you Andy for
> >>> putting that up and pointing it out.
> >>>
> >>> The astral is a very interesting
> >>> concept. I cannot think of an
> >>> equivalent word in English, or
> >>> even a quick definition for the
> >>> term - yet your presentation gives
> >>> me just enough to get an intuitive
> >>> sense of it. The meaning is
> >>> familiar - but I don't have clear
> >>> words for it. What is your take
> >>> on what the concept of the astral
> >>> is to a babalawo and others who
> >>> use the term?
> >>>
> >>> And what an imposing translation
> >>> job this kind of research must
> >>> require - across modes of
> >>> production, continents, eras,
> >>> classes - and of course,
> >>> languages. No wonder so few
> >>> researchers try to do something
> >>> like this! It must be extremely
> >>> difficult to translate concepts
> >>> across such expanses in time,
> >>> space, class and mind. It grossly
> >>> oversimplifies the task to just
> >>> describe it as the challenge of
> >>> translating a localized, religious
> >>> and mostly oral use of Spanish to
> >>> written and formal CHAT-ese
> >>> English - but that begins to give
> >>> a flavor of how complex it must
> >>> be. I salute you, Martin, and all
> >>> those in CHAT, with Mike as the
> >>> great-granddad, who have been
> >>> doing this remarkable kind of
> >>> work. It is one of the
> >>> cutting-edge aspects of CHAT.
> >>>
> >>> What intrigues me about the astral
> >>> is how psychologically *concrete*
> >>> this concept seems to be in the
> >>> lives of the people interested in
> >>> the Oruba and Santaria religions.
> >>> Its concreteness strikes me in at
> >>> least two ways.
> >>>
> >>> One is the role of the concept of
> >>> the astral in making lifestyle
> >>> choices about loaning out personal
> >>> belongings such as clothing,
> >>> towels, soap. You point to the
> >>> solidity of the babalawo's
> >>> argument. My intuition is telling
> >>> me he can do this because of the
> >>> concreteness of the concept of the
> >>> astral he is relying on and
> >>> explaining.
> >>>
> >>> Another aspect of concreteness I
> >>> think I detect is the role of the
> >>> concept of the astral as part of
> >>> what is apparently an elaborate
> >>> system of psychological and social
> >>> concepts that can be used to
> >>> describe, explain and predict
> >>> human behavior. I think of that
> >>> endeavor as 'concrete' because I
> >>> can't think of anything people
> >>> like to talk about more! And the
> >>> concept of the astral seems to
> >>> clearly enable that kind of
> >>> conversation. (And it is much
> >>> catchier than "higher mental
> >>> functions," don't you think?)
> >>>
> >>> The babalawo describes the astral
> >>> as luck, as stability, as being
> >>> potentially negative, of having
> >>> your astral or your luck stolen,
> >>> as enveloping or being enveloped,
> >>> etc. Many complex possibilities
> >>> and configurations are indicated
> >>> in a single stream of
> >>> explanations. Like concepts such
> >>> as karma, soul, aura, etc. there
> >>> seems to be some long-developed
> >>> knowledge about the nature of
> >>> human relations contained in the
> >>> concept of the astral. But I
> >>> can't quite put this implicit
> >>> knowledge into explicit words.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Steve
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:57 PM,
> >>> Martin Packer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was hoping someone might
> >>> analyze this passage for me,
> >>> but I guess I'll have to do it
> >>> myself!
> >>>
> >>> Much of the babalawo's talk
> >>> takes the form of advice,
> >>> recommendations, obligations
> >>> for the future conduct of the
> >>> client. What she has to do, or
> >>> ought to do, includes “go to
> >>> the church and make mass for
> >>> you deceased relatives,” “look
> >>> after your mother, by phone,”
> >>> “arrange a sacrifice,” “pray,”
> >>> “wear your hair loose,” and so
> >>> on. In the excerpt above, the
> >>> advice is to stop lending her
> >>> clothes.
> >>>
> >>> It is worth considering in
> >>> detail the way this advice is
> >>> offered. In this excerpt it is
> >>> grounded in what “Orula says”
> >>> (93) but immediately a warrant
> >>> is added: “because that is
> >>> stealing your luck” (we have
> >>> translated suerte as ‘luck,’
> >>> but it could equally be
> >>> ‘fate’). This is then
> >>> clarified, and then the
> >>> babalawo recommends to the
> >>> client that she make her own
> >>> observation; if she does so,
> >>> she will see that her sister,
> >>> who on occasion uses her
> >>> clothes, is happy, content,
> >>> while she, the client, is not
> >>> (94-96). This is presented as
> >>> an empirical demonstration of
> >>> the Orula’s point: due to the
> >>> fact that her sister has worn
> >>> her clothes, the client’s
> >>> astral has been stolen. It
> >>> also counters a possible
> >>> rebuttal: the “If not…” can be
> >>> glossed as “If you don’t
> >>> believe me, consider this…”
> >>> The consequence of this is
> >>> that the client is unhappy,
> >>> while her sister is happy. The
> >>> babalawo then offers
> >>> additional clarification,
> >>> “because…” one can wash ones
> >>> clothes a hundred times, the
> >>> astral of the person who wore
> >>> them cannot be removed
> >>> (96-98). This displays a
> >>> counter to a possible
> >>> qualification that the loss of
> >>> one’s astral might be
> >>> prevented by the simple
> >>> expedient of washing the
> >>> clothes that have been
> >>> borrowed. Then he adds what
> >>> could be taken as an appeal to
> >>> his authority, or a
> >>> confirmation that he himself
> >>> lives by the advice he is
> >>> offering to her: “We, the
> >>> religious, don’t loan our
> >>> clothing…” (98). This
> >>> functions as backing to the
> >>> validity of the central
> >>> claims. He elaborates further;
> >>> not only clothing should not
> >>> be shared, but also shoes,
> >>> towels, soap. Nor do they do
> >>> the reciprocal: they don’t
> >>> “wear the clothes of another
> >>> person” (101), this countering
> >>> the possible objection that if
> >>> the effect works one way, it
> >>> ought to work in the opposite
> >>> direction, but this has not
> >>> been mentioned.
> >>>
> >>> The passage displays a complex
> >>> and subtle argumentative
> >>> organization. It starts with
> >>> the central claim, then a
> >>> warrant (“because…”), then a
> >>> more explicit statement of the
> >>> mechanism that is claimed to
> >>> be operating (“wear someone’s
> >>> clothes… steals their luck”),
> >>> then it counters a possible
> >>> rebuttal, then counters a
> >>> possible qualification. Then a
> >>> backing is provided, and a
> >>> further warrant. Finally,
> >>> another possible qualification
> >>> is countered.
> >>>
> >>> Recall Toulmin's model of
> >>> argument:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> <Toulmin.pdf>
> >>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 9:54 AM,
> >>> Martin Packer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Steve mentioned the
> >>> presentation I gave at
> >>> ISCAR, on a study
> >>> conducted by a student
> >>> here in Colombia (Silvia
> >>> Tibaduisa) of the
> >>> babalawo. I discussed an
> >>> excerpt from a divination
> >>> session; here it is:
> >>>
> >>> Let me ask a little
> >>> question. You live in a
> >>> aparte-studio... in an
> >>> apartment, with other
> >>> people. What person wears
> >>> your clothing?
> >>>
> >>> Yes. Sometimes my cousin
> >>> or my sister uses them
> >>>
> >>> Orula says not to lend
> >>> your clothes any more,
> >>> because that is stealing
> >>> your luck. That the person
> >>> who wears someone’s
> >>> clothes steals their
> >>> astral, steals their luck.
> >>> If not, make an
> >>> observation yourself, of
> >>> how your cousin lives and
> >>> how you live. She's all
> >>> happy, all content, and
> >>> you’re not. That is how
> >>> someone’s luck, stability,
> >>> leaves them. Because
> >>> [when] one lends their
> >>> astral, although one
> >>> washes it 100 times, it
> >>> takes holds of the astral
> >>> of the other person as
> >>> well, and if it’s a
> >>> negative astral, it also
> >>> includes one. We, the
> >>> religious, don’t loan our
> >>> clothing, we don’t bathe
> >>> with the same towel or the
> >>> same soap. We don’t lend
> >>> underwear, socks, shoes,
> >>> anything. Because these
> >>> are one's personal things
> >>> and that takes hold of
> >>> your astral. Nor wear the
> >>> clothes of another person.
> >>>
> >>> The English reads a little
> >>> oddly because I prefer
> >>> literalish translations.
> >>> There are a number of
> >>> interesting
> >>> characteristics to this
> >>> exchange, but I want to
> >>> focus on the reasoning
> >>> involved. I would suggest
> >>> that it is perfectly
> >>> recognizable to us.
> >>> Substitute a more familiar
> >>> premise: not "when someone
> >>> wears your clothes they
> >>> steal your astral" but
> >>> "when someone uses your
> >>> toothbrush they give you
> >>> bacteria" and the rest
> >>> follows logically, doesn't
> >>> it?
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>>
> ______________________________
> >>> ____________
> >>> _____
> >>> xmca mailing list
> >>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >>> <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >
> >>>
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/*
> >>> *listinfo/xmca <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________**
> >>> ____________
> >>> _____
> >>> xmca mailing list
> >>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >>> <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> >>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/**
> >>> listinfo/xmca <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________**
> >>> ____________
> >>> _____
> >>> xmca mailing list
> >>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >>> <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> >>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/**
> >>> listinfo/xmca <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Tamara Powell
> >>> tjpowell@ucsd.edu
> >>> <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com<
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Tamara Powell
> >>> tjpowell@ucsd.edu <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**
> >>> gmail.com <tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Tamara Powell
> >>> tjpowell@ucsd.edu <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com<
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Tamara Powell
> >>> tjpowell@ucsd.edu <mailto:tamarajeanpowell@**gmail.com<
> tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> >> ------------
> >> *Andy Blunden*
> >> Joint Editor MCA: http://www.tandfonline.com/**toc/hmca20/18/1<
> http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hmca20/18/1>
> >> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
> >> Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.**aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<
> http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Tamara Powell
> tjpowell@ucsd.edu <tamarajeanpowell@gmail.com>
>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca