We take somewhat of a Vygotskian perspective in: Smagorinsky, P., & Taxel, J. (2005). The discourse of character education: Culture wars in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. I suspect that Kohlberg's model (which we treat in the book) remains at large because stage theories are appealing in their simplicity. I should note that our approach relies a bit more on Bakhtin than LSV, but the principles are very similar. I'll also attach an article version that summarizes part of the study, and another one that's forthcoming that looks at a different data set. p -----Original Message----- From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Ivo Banaco Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 5:39 AM To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity Subject: [xmca] Vygotskian framework to moral development Does anyone is aware of the literature applying a Vygotskian (or AT) framework to moral development? Need some help as I'm beginning my research on the topic and find Kohlberg model and Blasi's concerns on the moral self to be dominant on moral development literature. I wonder why... Ivo __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Attachment:
JRCE2004.pdf
Description: JRCE2004.pdf
Attachment:
JRCE2010.pdf
Description: JRCE2010.pdf
__________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca