[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Honestly....
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Honestly....
- From: Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:52:08 +1000
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <OFC886C376.17F68715-ON86257711.004E5A0D-86257711.004EF28A@spps.org>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <OFC886C376.17F68715-ON86257711.004E5A0D-86257711.004EF28A@spps.org>
- Reply-to: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Eric, I think it quite possible to hold at the same time
different positions on intersubjectivity and on the question
of innate/acquired. There is no doubt that there are social
animals whose sociality is innate and who can therefore
acquire new skills socially. But I believe CHAT is a current
of thought which holds that becoming human is possible only
through interaction with other people using culturally
acquired artefacts (i.e., intersubjectivity plus artefacts),
but even the tendency to engage in interaction is acquired
only because other human beings around the child "summon"
the child to interaction. There is no innate drive to
sociality in human beings. A. I. Meshcheryakov's book is
definitive on this question I believe.
Does that answer your question, Eric? I wasn't sure I got
your meaning exactly.
Andy
ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org wrote:
....didn't realize equating Piaget with intersubjectivity would create a
conflaguration of misunderstanding.
Am I incorrect in my understanding of intersubjectivity? I believe it to
be based on innate abilities rather than appropriated skills. Perhaps
Bahktin did not write on this, I must admit I am shallow in my
understanding of Bahktin.
Initially in my study of LSV and the CHAT tradition I was a person who
prioritized innate abilities but as I have studied and practiced teaching
I have come to realize that being human IS developed via interactions and
attachments. Biological genetics must play into it but I have a hard time
believing that intersubjectivity is biological in nature.
Am I talking in circles or drowing in misunderstanding?
eric
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden http://home.mira.net/~andy/ +61 3 9380 9435
Skype andy.blunden
An Interdisciplinary Theory of Activity:
http://www.brill.nl/scss
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca