[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[xmca] intersubjectivity = Piaget, mentalisation = LSV
- To: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: [xmca] intersubjectivity = Piaget, mentalisation = LSV
- From: ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:48:07 -0500
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Hello all:
Following the recent conversation on XMCA has provided great food for
thought and it has encouraged me to reread both chapter 6 in Thought and
Language as well as the Fonadgy et al. article pertaining to the
parent/child diad. What I have taken away from this is something I would
like to share in infant form and perhaps other will see the correlation as
well.
For me Chapter six is not necessarily a formulated theory pertaining to
how children form scientific concepts but rather an argument that pertains
to Piaget being wrong in his theory of development. Over and over LSV
states that instruction should lead development but what he doesn't say is
at what time and for how long and pertaining to what subject but rather
insists that by leading development eventually something will click in the
child and the concept shall be formed. This is different than Piaget who
lays out innate levels that are achieved and then built upon.
In the Fonagy et al. article he refutes the intersubjectivity theory based
upon the idea that it assumes that humans have an innate ability to see
from other's point of view and replaces with a mentalisation theory that
states humans formulate an ability to 'mentalize' how others have emotions
based upon the attachment that person has as they are developing. In this
essence Fonagy is extremely similar to LSV that Fonagy does not state a
specific amount of interactions but rather states there is a window of
opportunity for the child to develop this mentalisation and for some it
will take a certain level of interactions and for others it will be
different. LSV and Fonagy both theororize that instruction leads
development and innateness is not the answer.
hoping for more rainfall up north here so the morel picking will be
bountiful
eric
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca