I wanted to mention an interesting article just posted to the Teachers College website
[this site is available for only $15.00 a year and all their archived material is able to be accessed. It is one of the best bargains around]
Nancy Lesko has written an article called
"The Pedagogy of Monsters: Scary Disturbances in a Doctoral Research Preparation Course"
She is brutally honest about the profound anxiety and vulnerability that doctoral students experience when their basic personal notions of epistemologies and ontologies are "troubled" and "critiqued"
What I wanted to link this article to is our discussions on the positivist or negative experiences of promoting a stance of novelty, uncertainty, and ambivalence.
Lesko's article captures the profound disruptions and crisis that doctoral programs can precipitate in their graduate students as they consciousy set out to unsettle and challenge all preconceived assumptions.
My attempting to embrace ambiguity and uncertainty is contrasted with this other experience of ambiguity when students don't feel safe and recognized.
I would invite others consider that school children in public schools may also be feeling the types of vulnerabilities Lesko is documenting in a doctoral research preparation course.
When you read and remember how you felt while attending university [if it was similar to what Lesko documents] it may promote reflection on how necessary it is to "bring children to mind" BEFORE trying to teach knowledge
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 5:58 am
Subject: [xmca] (ism) v (ist)
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Cc: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
In the xmca archive there is much discussion about the
differences between
just these two modifiers. Never settled, perhaps never
will. From a
linguist standpoint one is active and one is passive.
Helen; from my own experience when I wrote my master's thesis (
A
Vygotskian perspective on Special Education Transition Services)
my
supervisor kept asking if I wouldn't be better off making the
argument
from an Ericson point of view so I believe mainstream acadamia
is still
confused about what cultural-historical theory is; however, I
believe I am
safe in saying it is not social constructivism. Has your
supervisor
specifically stated where they are finding the descrepancies in
your
argument? In my thesis I wanted to use more Valsiner and
Van der Veer
references but found they did not coexist very well with the
Vygotsky,
Luria, Scribner, and Cole cross cultural studies I was referencing.
Maybe this helps, maybe this muddies the water?
eric
Helen Grimmett <helen.grimmett@education.monash.edu.au>
Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
04/06/2010 09:38 PM
Please respond to "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"
To: lchcmike@gmail.com, "eXtended Mind,
Culture, Activity"
<xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
cc:
Subject: Re: [xmca]
Book review ol talk and texts
Can I please ask a (probably extremely naive) question? What are the
differences between social constructivism (as referred to in
this book
review) and cultural-historical theory? My supervisor keeps
telling me I
am confusing my arguments by using references from both
paradigms, but I
still haven't managed to grasp what the difference is.
Thanks,
Helen
----- Original Message -----
From: mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 11:59 am
Subject: Re: [xmca] Book review ol talk and texts
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Cc: Roy Pea <roypea@stanford.edu>
Thanks for the review, Larry.
So many important issue intersect there.
Gotta find out what Joe Polman and Roy Pea have to offer on
the
learningparadox. Thought Newman et al. set that one to rest
back in
the last
millennium!! And to think that it involves a revival of the
idea of
a zoped
in transformative communication! Super.
:-)
mike
Roy-- Can you send us the text? Really sounds interesting.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Larry Purss
<lpurss@shaw.ca> wrote:
I just read this review of a new book that I thought may be
interesting to
some of the CHAT community so I''ve attached the
review. David
Olson wrote
one of the chapters.
Larry
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca