[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] The Interpersonal Is Not the Sociocultural
- To: ablunden@mira.net, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] The Interpersonal Is Not the Sociocultural
- From: Tony Whitson <twhitson@UDel.Edu>
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:05:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <4BB6BC86.9070305@mira.net>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:xmca-request@weber.ucsd.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <d2acf7c24ed82.4bb4a0ec@shaw.ca> <389068.10256.qm@web27201.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <9C6D8B02-F976-48E8-990F-67684034572D@umich.edu> <7926B57D-995D-4465-8ED6-3AF7E71B0DF2@uvic.ca> <4BB5F084.3070309@mira.net> <98FB8803-374C-4DA7-AAF9-74D22E6F2E09@uvic.ca> <4BB5F652.5010406@mira.net> <6C66E209-89B4-4B3B-96B9-C3AEC3621771@uvic.ca> <6665D6DDCAB33A47A2118B4E5BAB5F3337867B@helios.hec.ohio-state.edu> <2683F634-6437-4734-A9A7-5EBF1C8C4DAA@uvic.ca> <r2v30364f991004021141ka3246db3g4ea66904acfccb27@mail.gmail.com> <0E1B1372-5A1D-40B0-A362-6D59360958EF@uvic.ca> <4BB6BC86.9070305@mira.net>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
- Sender: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
Q: What was Nietzsche, in terms of his "Discipline"?
A: Nietzsche was a Philologist.
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Andy Blunden wrote:
Michael,
Every text has a context, a history and a speaker. To understand a text it is
certainly necessary to access each of these resources. Every German speaker
will know without a moment's reflection the semantic connection between
Tätigkeit, Tat and tun, but I find that few German speakers are aware of the
history of the concept from Herder to Fichte to Hess to Marx. It is possible
to exactly what Marx is talking about in Theses on Feuerbach, even though
Marx never explains what he means by Tätigkeit, because we know the history
of the word and who Marx was talking to at the time and the context of
Germany after the suppression of Hegelianism. Key words like Tätigkeit have
to be studied, and I find that this study is as necessary for German speakers
as it is for Anglophile monoglots like me ... especially if they believe that
"there is nothing outside of the text" :).
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca