These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: [xmca] chit chat

From: Andy Blunden <ablunden who-is-at mira.net>
Date: Wed Dec 26 2007 - 14:56:23 PST

Well, for example, I propose an approach to the vexed sign/tool issue which
introduces a new ontological solution as well as adding a third instance to
this dualism. I would have thought this alone could have kept us going for
a month.
Also, my article does claim to offer an approach to the "problem of the
individual" and I certainly know of no better solution; that would be worth
a bit of discussion.
Andy
At 10:37 AM 26/12/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>I am unsure where we are on the subject of the subject in Andy's article.
>I only have bits and patch's of the discussion articulated and a
>vague memory to look up idiographic/nomothetic on wikipedia.
>
>What do you make, overall, of the discussion thus far, Andy, and what issues
>have not been raised that would be helful to you?
>
>mike

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Dec 26 14:57 PST 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 07 2008 - 10:13:50 PST