Phillip,
I think Foucault pertains to all patterns of social behavior, including
theory and academic disciplines. I come to this from sociology of
knowledge and symbolic interaction, not from an immersion in CHAT. My
thinking has the imprint of Mannheim and Durkheim... and I see
complexity theory echoing, replaying many of their 'conversations.'
I have a family wedding in three days and I cannot give to this
discussion what I want to right now. I shall return with a more complete
response after the weekend.
I will looking forward to the opportunity....
Molly
Phillip White wrote:
>Molly writes:
>
>>Foucault's Archaeology of Knowledge has seemed to me to be relevant in
>>these conversations.
>>
>
> could you speak more about this? i'm wondering how you see F. relevant
>to these conversations? are you speaking of emergence in particular?
>
>>I salute CHAT practitioners because they persist in
>>trying to 'map' process in such detail. "Playing" with metaphors has
>>seemed a bit more safe to me.
>>
>
> do you mean that the mapping process is more rigorous - disciplined -
>than - but here, i don't know what you mean by "playing" ......
>
> i'm not making the leaps to keep up with you.
>
>phillip
>
>
>
>
>* * * * * * * *
>* *
>
>The English noun "identity" comes, ultimately, from the
>Latin adverb "identidem", which means "repeatedly."
>The Latin has exactly the same rhythm as the English,
>buh-BUM-buh-BUM - a simple iamb, repeated; and
>"identidem" is, in fact, nothing more than a
>reduplication of the word "idem", "the same":
>"idem(et)idem". "Same(and) same". The same,
>repeated. It is a word that does exactly what
>it means.
>
> from "The Elusive Embrace" by Daniel
>Mendelsohn.
>
>phillip white
>university of colorado at denver
>denver, colorado
>phillip_white@ceo.cudenver.edu
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 01 2002 - 01:00:07 PDT