Peter,
Is it true a child with autism has limited social interaction? I would tend
to see that very much as a stereotype in how we seem to equate the social
with verbal. I too have dealt with many autistic children and while as a
mediational means the verbal is limited - I don't think its accurate to make
the jump to social interaction.
One example, computers have been very central in my experience with autistic
children. Is that interaction social? I would argue very much so. In
addition in having worked with them one on one communicating physically
through non-verbal actions, gestures, etc seem very important forms of
social interaction.
In regards to chemical imbalances do not we come to terms with those in
Activity we are engaged in. We must not forget that the countless children
with chemical imbalances (ADHD) rarely take their medication on the weekend.
And if they do or don't take their medication that is realized in concrete
ways within activity. They may be moralized, normalized, and many other
things in concrete ways in social activity that no doubt forms the
personality. Is not it activity where the child would come to terms with
this thing called chemical imbalances.
For me the Activity category is useful in that it has the "potential" to
move away from classical biological / social dichotomies. In short, it is in
social activity where we come to terms with things like autism, chemical
imbalances etc. I mean the chemicals inside the head definately don't have
agency or at least not on the level of human personality. Especially with
chemical imbalances it seems they are more noticeable in some activities
than others and this no doubt influences ones personality.
Nate
----Original Message-----
From: Peter Smagorinsky [mailto:smago@peachnet.campuscwix.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 5:07 PM
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: RE: leont'ev: externalization/internalization etc
I think I might have sent this directly to Helena by mistake. Here's our
exchange:
I regret that I haven't had time to read the Leont'ev text, though I've
save it for future reference/reading. In response to Helena's post: I must
wonder how radically we can attribute personality exclusively to social
activity. I speak as someone who knows people with chemical imbalances
whose personalities have changed dramatically through medical interventions
(e.g., Risperdal for psychotic episodes; Paxil and related medications for
high anxiety/depression; etc.). One could argue that these medications are
socially produced and that taking them is part of practical activity, and
that's true. But what of people who don't have access to the medications
and therapy and so have personalities that are shaped by their chemical
makeup? I also think of a couple of young kids I know who are autistic and
who have very limited social interaction. Surely their biochemistry has a
lot to do with their personalities.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 01 2000 - 01:00:50 PST