Re(2): ilyenkov-ideal: synopsis

From: Diane Hodges (dhodges@ceo.cudenver.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 15:54:17 PDT


paul,

the casual speech i rely upon, to respond to what i interpret as a kind of
dominant thinking
in the traditional work of Theory,
is not a mask for fear, but truly, really, a sigh of boredom - and by
boredom, i don't mean
 "i- don't-understand" boring,

but more the "oiy-not-this-again" boredom, like with re-runs on
television.
totalitarianism is not scarey-in-itself, of course, what is (yawning)
redundant is the
persistent resurrections in the 19thC-speak of writer traditions.

cheers,
diane
   **********************************************************************
                                        :point where everything listens.
and i slow down, learning how to
enter - implicate and unspoken (still) heart-of-the-world.

(Daphne Marlatt, "Coming to you")
***********************************************************************

diane celia hodges

 university of british columbia, centre for the study of curriculum and
instruction
==================== ==================== =======================
 university of colorado, denver, school of education

Diane_Hodges@ceo.cudenver.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 01:00:49 PDT