These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
At 20.45 -0700 0-04-02, Mike Cole scrobe:
>And what terms did Frege use?
Frege writes about *Sinn und Bedeutung*... I have unfortunately only a
Swedish translation and it probably does more to further the confusion than
to straighten out curves -- it is translated into *Mening och betydelse*
which seem also to be able to shift subjective/objective places in
different discourses, like meaning and sense.
But, *Bedeutung* as used by Frege seems to refer to the-object-referred to
(by a sign), while his *Sinn* refers to the WAY this object is given in a
proposition. Thence his famous example with the Evening star/ /the Morning
star -- which have the same Bedeutung (refer to the same thingy-in-the-sky)
but different Sinn... now, is the English title of this essay *Sense and
Reference* or *Meaning and Reference*? :-)
Eva
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 09:21:11 PDT