Re: empty or not

Eva Ekeblad (eva.ekeblad who-is-at ped.gu.se)
Tue, 23 Apr 1996 08:04:14 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eva Ekeblad: "Re: straw man?"
Previous message: KEN GOODMAN: "Re: assessment, lang. arts"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Cole: "empty or not"
Next in thread: griffiri who-is-at HUGSE1.HARVARD.EDU: "Re: empty or not"

>It is only from the (ironic in Latour, I think) viewpoint of the classical
>notion of a psyche that there is anything to 'empty out'. All the
>processes and activities are still there, but now they are there
>in networks of activities which cross the Cartesian boundary, which
>dissolve that boundary...

So Jay
it isn't empty or not
but closed-off or not
is that what you are saying?

Eva

Next message: Eva Ekeblad: "Re: straw man?"
Previous message: KEN GOODMAN: "Re: assessment, lang. arts"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Cole: "empty or not"
Next in thread: griffiri who-is-at HUGSE1.HARVARD.EDU: "Re: empty or not"