[Xmca-l] Re: Do we find Inequalities in wild life system?

Andy Blunden andyb@marxists.org
Mon Jan 28 21:15:12 PST 2019


When you get the electric chair for murdering someone that 
is not a linguistic construct.

andy

------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden
http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
On 29/01/2019 2:49 pm, Adam Poole (16517826) wrote:
>
> Perhaps it may be more appropriate to use the term 
> 'quasi-objective form', as the medium through which 
> concepts like inequality and injustice are made objective, 
> language, is itself inherently subjective. For example, 
> justice can be given objective form in law, but the law 
> itself is comprised of language, customs, traditions, 
> beliefs, etc. The manifestation of an objective form is 
> not universal, but will differ depending on cultural 
> context. Hence quasi-objective. Concepts like inequality 
> are given objective form, but it doesn't mean that they 
> are objective in nature, due to the mediating role 
> of language.
>
>
> Adam
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu 
> <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu> on behalf of Andy 
> Blunden <andyb@marxists.org>
> *Sent:* 29 January 2019 08:16:35
> *To:* xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu
> *Subject:* [Xmca-l] Re: Do we find Inequalities in wild 
> life system?
>
> Mmm, "subjective" is a polysemous word, Huw. It is not a 
> matter of precision but of relativity. "Inequality" is a 
> famously contested concept, as is "injustice," but its 
> contestation is necessarily in a social context and with 
> social content. Justice and equality are given objective 
> form in law and social policy in definite, really-existing 
> states or organisations challenging for state power, not 
> the opinion of individuals.
>
> andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
> On 29/01/2019 1:50 am, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>> It isn't "subjective", Andy. Rather it is limited to a 
>> certain construal. One can be quite precise and objective 
>> about that construal.
>>
>> Huw
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 14:14, Andy Blunden 
>> <andyb@marxists.org <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     I can't agree that with your suggestion, Huw, that
>>     inequality (in the meaning with which Harshad used
>>     it) is something subjective, in the eye of the
>>     beholder. Such a view would be very pernicious
>>     politically. The fact is that states have emerged and
>>     developed over many centuries so as to makes
>>     objective certain concepts of justice, among which
>>     are various qualified and nuances notions of
>>     equality. This is not  figment of my imagination.
>>
>>     andy
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Andy Blunden
>>     http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
>>     On 29/01/2019 12:59 am, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>>>     We find "wild life" systems that are imbalanced and
>>>     subject to radical changes.
>>>
>>>     Inequality is a perceptual/cognitive construct and
>>>     predicated on an ontological scope. We find the
>>>     condition of inequality (or comparison) in our
>>>     thinking and behaviour. Every living thing "finds"
>>>     inequalities. We do not find inequality, we find the
>>>     awareness of inequality.
>>>
>>>     On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 08:17, James Ma
>>>     <jamesma320@gmail.com <mailto:jamesma320@gmail.com>>
>>>     wrote:
>>>
>>>         Should you find inequality within a wildlife
>>>         system, that must be a political, ideological
>>>         precept!
>>>
>>>         James
>>>
>>>         On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 07:56, James Ma
>>>         <jamesma320@gmail.com
>>>         <mailto:jamesma320@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Not only is it meaningless but also
>>>             preposterous. To maintain that all members
>>>             of the same species are equal, as Anne Moir
>>>             and David Jessel put it, is to "build a
>>>             society based on a biological and scientific
>>>             lie".
>>>             James
>>>             PS: I'm apolitical - anything political,
>>>             ideological just doesn't speak to me!
>>>
>>>             */_______________________________________________________/*
>>>
>>>             /*James Ma *Independent Scholar
>>>             //https://oxford.academia.edu/JamesMa
>>>             /
>>>
>>>
>>>             On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 05:27, Andy Blunden
>>>             <andyb@marxists.org
>>>             <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Harshad,
>>>
>>>                 "Inequality" is a meaningless concept
>>>                 when referred to Nature. Likewise
>>>                 "Injustice."
>>>
>>>                 Justice and equality are relevant only
>>>                 to the extent that the subjects are
>>>                 living in an 'artificial' world, out of
>>>                 Nature. Natural disasters and the
>>>                 plenitude of Nature have these
>>>                 dimensions only to the extent they are
>>>                 imposed on or made available to
>>>                 different classes of people by the
>>>                 social system.
>>>
>>>                 Hope that helps.
>>>
>>>                 Andy
>>>
>>>                 ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>                 Andy Blunden
>>>                 http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
>>>
>>>                 On 28/01/2019 4:00 pm, Harshad Dave wrote:
>>>>                 Hi,
>>>>
>>>>                 I am working on one article. I want to
>>>>                 know your views on following query.
>>>>
>>>>                 "Do we find Inequalities exists in wild
>>>>                 life system?"
>>>>
>>>>                 Your views will help me in my work.
>>>>
>>>>                 Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 Harshad Dave
>>>>                 Email: hhdave15@gmail.com
>>>>                 <mailto:hhdave15@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for 
> the addressee and may contain confidential information. If 
> you have received this message in error, please send it 
> back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, 
> copy or disclose the information contained in this message 
> or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by 
> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the 
> views of The University of Nottingham Ningbo China. This 
> message has been checked for viruses but the contents of 
> an attachment may still contain software viruses which 
> could damage your computer system: you are advised to 
> perform your own checks. Email communications with The 
> University of Nottingham Ningbo China may be monitored as 
> permitted by UK and Chinese legislation. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20190129/3e0c543c/attachment.html 


More information about the xmca-l mailing list