[Xmca-l] Re: Article for discussion: Facebook in Brazilian schools

[mike cole]

Alfredo et al

I read this message before reading the prior one. You are making the point
I was trying to make regarding discussion of the paper.
In our everyday lives we are experiencing a change in the wind (to use a
metaphor that Dylan made famous at another such time).
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ARE DISRUPTING THINGS AS USUAL for the first time in
my life. Call it 65 years.

And we are academics and some of us are are paid to theorize such matters.
To theorize the social organization of society was
Hugh's description of the social sciences. In most American Universities,
Psychology (cap P) is located in the social sciences.
Do we approach the problem from "below" as psychologists? Do we approach it
from "above" as sociologists and political scientists?
Can you link the Leontiev who writes about the nature of human
consciousness, psychologically speaking and conducts experiments in the
laboratory that look for all the world like what goes on in my psychology
department, AND as someone who can help understand the growth of social
movements? This may also be a way to address and understanding of the
overlap and variability in the ideas of Vygotsky and Friere.

Monica and Fernando must be reeling from all the complicated English we are
spewing. I look forward to the discussion.

Still worrying about Figure 3! I know I need to be able to interpret it but
I am doing a lousy job.

mike


On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Alfredo Jornet Gil <a.j.gil@iped.uio.no>
wrote:

> Thanks for finding and sharing the link, Andy, and thanks Michael and Mike
> for bringing the absolutely relevant connection to Parklands.
>
> There was not so long ago a discussion here as well as in a couple of
> articles in MCA about how crises leading to development most often result
> from quantitative increments that lead to qualitative leaps such that new
> forms of organization emerge from previous ones. So, David, I don't see why
> increments in the pace of circulation (e.g., of information) would not be
> expected to bring with them changes in the organisation of the whole
> economy system. I would not say that social media is just bringing a lot
> more of the same, just as I would not a priori reject the possibility that
> bringing a lot more of the same might not end up bringing new qualitative
> forms of communicating. The observation that "like" is intransitive in
> Facebook is interesting; but to me it needs to be put in its larger context
> of use. And so, are we analysing Facebook as a grammar closed up in itself,
> or as one more chain in a larger grammar of possible cooperation?
>
> I am myself concerned that Social Media like Facebook may be amplifying
> dichotomical thinking beyond the innocuous and often way-to-verbose essays
> we academics enjoy entertaining with much more complex verbal forms than
> Facebook's intransitive "likes", only that the confrontations now seem to
> be moving to family's dinner tables, quarrels among protesters in public
> squares, or previously unheard of incarcerations for publishing tweets and
> rap songs that critique the crown in a supposedly modern democracy like
> Spain (e.g.: http://cadenaser.com/ser/2018/02/20/tribunales/1519135083_
> 106543.html). But the article here discussed also shows that there are
> forms of organization that these technologies are affording that may bring
> more positive changes, like the case again in Spain of March 8th women's
> strike, the extent of which no politician or journalist had anticipated and
> which led the government to quickly adopt a much more equity-friendly
> discourse than even the evening before (https://www.youtube.com/
> watch?v=4_11iIELdfc). So, no, probably that one strike, or that one
> social media that may have made it possible, won't change the system. But
> they seem to incrementally add to something, don't they?
>
> Alfredo Jornet
> ________________________________
> New article in *Design Studies* "Imagining Design: Transitive and
> intransitive dimensions"
> Free print available: https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1WhHg_,KmyN6Dr
>
> ________________________________________
> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> on behalf of Andy Blunden <andyb@marxists.org>
> Sent: 12 March 2018 06:39
> To: xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Article for discussion: Facebook in Brazilian schools
>
> That headline does not exist, but is it this:
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/07/us/parkland-students-social-media.html
>
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> ttp://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
> On 12/03/2018 4:02 PM, mike cole wrote:
> > Michael - I have been trying to find a digital copy of a story in today's
> > NY Times titled "the social media warriors of parkland." For some reason
> it
> > is not visible on the digital version.... yet. Maybe someone out there in
> > xmca-land can find it for us? I will check again
> > in the morning to see if it appears.
> >      It seems especially relevant to Monica and Fernando's article, and
> to
> > David's comment that "  it is very hard for me to pinpoint any
> > actual new form of thinking or new form of speaking which was made
> possible by
> > Facebook."  The voices and forms of speaking used by the students was
> not,
> > so far as I could tell, the source of data. There are no quotations of
> any
> > students speaking differently. I assumed that this article was about
> > collective action.
> > Monica and Fernando - I confess I had difficulty following parts of the
> > article, perhaps because I am a very seldom user of Facebook. In
> > particular, I had difficulty understanding Figure 3.  Were the people who
> > started M1 also those who started M2-M3? ( " Once students achieved the
> > object of the activity—in the first case, to avoid the closure of the
> > schools—they focused the protests on another object").
> >
> > Did the M4 people get the idea from M1 through a FB connection form M1?
> Did
> > you get any sense of what distinguished pages that got a few hundred
> versus
> > 10,000 reactions?
> >
> > Harshad - Did you think the article failed to consider social issues?
> There
> > is no information about you on the xmca membership
> > page, so it is difficult to know from what part of the world you are
> > writing. Unless I miss my guess, some people will wonder at your
> > use of the word "man" where the local practice might put "humankind" or
> > some other gender inclusive term.
> >
> > David - Daylight saving time tonight so I find myself "working late."  It
> > got me to wondering how many people live in Seoul. A lot, it turns out.
> > About 9-10 million. That got me to wondering about how much faster all
> > those people would be getting around on horses with all the horse plops
> to
> > clamber over. And all that hay to haul into town for the morning rush
> > hour.  :-)
> >
> > mike
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Glassman, Michael <glassman.13@osu.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> I'm sure those meddling kids won't come back on your lawn any time soon.
> >>
> >> But really, the article did not say Facebook is a new type of
> technology.
> >> I believe they said that it's a form of human-technology interaction and
> >> suggested perhaps social media was a new type of human-technology
> >> interaction.  I don't agree with this phrasing. I tend to think of
> Facebook
> >> more as an application of Internet technology - but either way Facebook
> is
> >> just a form or an application. Is the internetworking of computer, radio
> >> and satellite communication an enormous step forward in how humans
> >> communicate.  I think so - it's really extraordinary on a number of
> levels
> >> but that's really not the conversation for this article.
> >>
> >> I do think the authors have done an analysis that is interesting and
> >> possibly important, especially when one considers what is currently
> going
> >> on down in Parkland (some might be happy to know that, at least from
> what I
> >> have read, Facebook isn't dominant or even that important for these
> >> students. Adults have been using it more for larger organizational
> events
> >> like the March 14 walkout and the March 24 march).  I have read some
> >> articles on organizing on online forums (and actually wrote a not very
> good
> >> one a few years back). Most of them are communications based an don't
> have
> >> strong theoretical underpinning which is why I think this article might
> be
> >> an important step forward.
> >>
> >> I think the idea of using third generation activity theory might be a
> good
> >> idea for this type of analysis. I myself have seen ties between the
> >> trialogical approach being developed by Hakkareinan and Paavola and
> what is
> >> going on down in Parkland. The students are creating their own projects
> and
> >> then getting the larger community to buy in to and support what they are
> >> doing which is in turn changing the quality of their activities. I have
> my
> >> own ideas on why this is suddenly happening and direct communication
> >> technologies like Twitter and texting (which seem primary vehicles) are
> >> only part of it.
> >>
> >> Anyway, this particular article I think is really timely and should give
> >> us a lot to think about.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-l-bounces@
> >> mailman.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of David Kellogg
> >> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 6:03 PM
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Article for discussion: Facebook in Brazilian
> schools
> >>
> >> So in the fifteenth century, Gutenberg exapted extant technology already
> >> widely available in China and published a single text using moveable
> type
> >> which started a profound intellectual, cultural, and social revolution
> >> whose effects we still feel today: the rise of Protestantism, the
> >> Counter-Reformation in, among other places, Brazil, the Wars of
> Religion in
> >> France, the vicissitudes of a multii-confessional (political) State and
> >> ultimately those of a multi-confessional (psychological) state, In the
> >> twentieth century, Ford similarly exapted extant technology, this time
> >> nearly two millenia later than China, and mass-produced automobiles
> using
> >> Taylorism, forcing everybody to buy an identical product with
> >> interchangeable parts made by factories with interchangeable workers.
> >> The automobile "revolution" did not even give us new roads, and in Seoul
> >> today traffic moves notably slower than it would on horseback. Clearly,
> >> there are some forms of technology that are actually semiogenic--and
> others
> >> which merely circulate capital at a faster rate and actually slow the
> >> movement of people and new ideas.
> >>
> >> So my question is very simple. How do we know that "Facebook" (which as
> >> the name implies was originally designed to help Harvard freshmen decide
> >> which classmates were sufficiently hot to "like") is really one of the
> >> former technologies?.There are very clear signs , beyond the obvious
> ones
> >> surrounding the American origins, that it belongs to the latter
> category,
> >> and not a few of them appear in this very article. First of all, the
> >> authors are honest enough to associate Facebook with reactionary,
> >> xenophobic, populist movements like the clowns who run the "Five Stars"
> >> movement in Italy. Second, on the very first page, the authors try but
> do
> >> not really seem to be able to distinguish between the "post first and
> >> organize later" technologies of Occupy Wall Street and the use of social
> >> media by the four movements in the article (including one actually
> called
> >> "Occupy Everything"). And thirdly, it is very hard for me to pinpoint
> any
> >> actual new form of thinking or new form of speaking which was made
> possible
> >> by Facebook. If anything, Facebook seems to narrow semiogenic power to a
> >> single consumer/computer menu. Ford said, you can get a Model A in any
> >> color you like so long as it's black. Facebook tells us the same thing,
> but
> >> makes the verb "like" intransitive.
> >>
> >> David Kellogg
> >> Sangmyung University
> >>
> >> Recent Article in *Early Years*
> >>
> >> The question of questions: Hasan’s critiques, Vygotsky’s crises, and the
> >> child’s first interrogatives <https://www.tandfonline.com/
> >> doi/full/10.1080/09575146.2018.1431874>
> >>
> >> Free e-print available at:
> >> https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6EeWMigjFARavQjDJjcW/full
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Alfredo Jornet Gil <
> a.j.gil@iped.uio.no>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear xmca'ers,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> it is (bit over) due time for introducing the article for discussion
> >>> from MCA's 2018 Issue 1, before Issue 2 comes upon us soon.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The selected article, by Monica Ferreira Lemos and Fernando Rezende da
> >>> Cunha Júnior, is about two topics that were thematised in the last
> >>> ISCAR congress and that ought to be of much relevance to current and
> >>> future CHAT-related research: Social media and social movements. In
> >>> particular, the article examines how students use social media for the
> >>> organization and development of 4 social movements in Brazil.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The article is attached and is Free access during the discussion
> period.
> >>> It can be accessed free in the following link:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10749039.2017.1379823
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The authors have kindly agreed to participate in the discussion and
> >>> they will be introducing themselves soon. I hope you  will find the
> >>> article interesting and please don't be shy to share anything you
> >>> might have learned reading it, anything you might wonder about it or
> >>> that you would like see discussed. Having authors engage in dialogue
> >>> is a great opportunity that this community offers and that makes sense
> >>> the most when many of you participate. Good reading!
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>>
> >>> Alfredo Jornet
> >>>
> >>> New article in *Design Studies* "Imagning Design: Transitive and
> >>> intransitive dimensions"
> >>> Free print available: https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1WhHg_,KmyN6Dr
> >>>
> >>
>
>